Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31748623›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

DeepIso: A Deep Learning Model for Peptide Feature Detection from LC-MS map.

Fatema Tuz Zohora, M Ziaur Rahman, Ngoc Hieu Tran, Lei Xin, Baozhen Shan, Ming Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A Fast Neural Network for Isotopic Charge State Assignment.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Deep Learning Based MS2 Feature Detection for Data-Independent Shotgun Proteomics.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fatema Tuz ZohoraDavid R. Cheriton School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.
M Ziaur RahmanDavid R. Cheriton School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.
Ngoc Hieu TranDavid R. Cheriton School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5186-8852
Lei XinBioinformatics Solutions Inc., Waterloo, ON, N2L 6J2, Canada.
Baozhen ShanBioinformatics Solutions Inc., Waterloo, ON, N2L 6J2, Canada.
Ming LiDavid R. Cheriton School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada. mli@uwaterloo.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2157-2775

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) based quantitative proteomics provides the relative different protein abundance in healthy and disease-afflicted patients, which offers the information for molecular interactions, signaling pathways, and biomarker identification to serve the drug discovery and clinical research. Typical analysis workflow begins with the peptide feature detection and intensity calculation from LC-MS map. We are the first to propose a deep learning based model, DeepIso, that combines recent advances in Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) to detect peptide features of different charge states, as well as, estimate their intensity. Existing tools are designed with limited engineered features and domain-specific parameters, which are hardly updated despite a huge amount of new coming proteomic data. On the other hand, DeepIso consisting of two separate deep learning based modules, learns multiple levels of representation of high dimensional data itself through many layers of neurons, and adaptable to newly acquired data. The peptide feature list reported by our model matches with 97.43% of high quality MS/MS identifications in a benchmark dataset, which is higher than the matching produced by several widely used tools. Our results demonstrate that novel deep learning tools are desirable to advance the state-of-the-art in protein identification and quantification.

Indexed as

BiomarkersChromatography, LiquidDeep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronsPeptidesProteinsProteomicsTandem Mass SpectrometryWorkflowBiomarkersPeptidesProteins

Identifiers

PMID31748623
PMCPMC6868186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.