ArticleScientific reports2019
Prognostic effects of clinical and CT imaging features on critically ill patients with interstitial lung disease hospitalized in respiratory intensive care unit.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management strategies and outcomes predictors of interstitial lung disease exacerbation admitted to an intensive care setting: A narrative review.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2025Review
- Cyclophosphamide for interstitial lung disease-associated acute respiratory failure: mortality, clinical response and radiological characteristics.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study aimed to evaluate the clinical and imaging features of critically ill patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) treated in respiratory intensive care unit (RICU) and assess the prognostic effects of these factors. A total of 160 severe ILD patients admitted to the RICU were finally enrolled in this study. The clinical, imaging and follow-up data of them were studied retrospectively. The in-hospital mortality and total mortality were 43.1% and 63.8% respectively. By multivariate cox regression analysis, shock (OR = 2.39, P = 0.004), pulmonary fibrosis on CT (OR = 2.85, P = 0.002) and non-invasive ventilation (OR = 1.86, P = 0.037) were harmful factors to survivals of critically ill patients with ILD. In contrast, oxygenation index (OR = 0.99, P = 0.028), conventional oxygen therapy (OR = 0.59, P = 0.048) and β-lactam antibiotics use (OR = 0.51, P = 0.004) were protective factors. There is significant difference of survivals between patients with and without fibrosing ILD on CT (Log-rank, p = 0.001). The prognosis of critically ill patients with ILD was poor. Shock, respiratory failure and fibrosing signs on chest CT affected the prognosis. Chest CT was considered as a valuable tool to indicate the prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.