Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31748546›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Structural determinants of microtubule minus end preference in CAMSAP CKK domains.

Joseph Atherton, Yanzhang Luo, Shengqi Xiang, Chao Yang, Ankit Rai, Kai Jiang, Marcel Stangier, Annapurna Vemu, Alexander D Cook, Su Wang and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An Orthogonal Way of Writing the Tubulin Code.Cytoskeleton (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  4. Microtubule Minus-End Binding Proteins in Cancer: Advances.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Non-coding ribonucleic acid-mediatedFrontiers in genetics · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Joseph AthertonInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Birkbeck, University of London, Malet Street, London, UK. j.atherton@mail.cryst.bbk.ac.uk.
Yanzhang LuoNMR Spectroscopy, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9149-2423
Shengqi XiangNMR Spectroscopy, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Chao YangCell Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ankit RaiCell Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3732-3597
Kai JiangMedical Research Institute, School of Medicine, Wuhan University, 430071, Wuhan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6871-737X
Marcel StangierLaboratory of Biomolecular Research, Division of Biology and Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, PSI, Switzerland.
Annapurna VemuCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Alexander D CookInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Birkbeck, University of London, Malet Street, London, UK.
Su WangInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Birkbeck, University of London, Malet Street, London, UK.
Antonina Roll-MecakCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2621-7307
Michel O SteinmetzLaboratory of Biomolecular Research, Division of Biology and Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, PSI, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6157-3687
Anna AkhmanovaCell Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9048-8614
Marc BaldusNMR Spectroscopy, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH, Utrecht, The Netherlands. M.Baldus@uu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7068-5613
Carolyn A MooresInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Birkbeck, University of London, Malet Street, London, UK. c.moores@mail.cryst.bbk.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5686-6290
Utrecht University · NLInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology · GBNational Heart Lung and Blood Institute · USNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke · USPaul Scherrer Institute · CHUniversity of Basel · CHUniversity of Science and Technology of China · CNWuhan University · CN

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L014211/1Medical Research Council MR/R000352/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CAMSAP/Patronins regulate microtubule minus-end dynamics. Their end specificity is mediated by their CKK domains, which we proposed recognise specific tubulin conformations found at minus ends. To critically test this idea, we compared the human CAMSAP1 CKK domain (HsCKK) with a CKK domain from Naegleria gruberi (NgCKK), which lacks minus-end specificity. Here we report near-atomic cryo-electron microscopy structures of HsCKK- and NgCKK-microtubule complexes, which show that these CKK domains share the same protein fold, bind at the intradimer interprotofilament tubulin junction, but exhibit different footprints on microtubules. NMR experiments show that both HsCKK and NgCKK are remarkably rigid. However, whereas NgCKK binding does not alter the microtubule architecture, HsCKK remodels its microtubule interaction site and changes the underlying polymer structure because the tubulin lattice conformation is not optimal for its binding. Thus, in contrast to many MAPs, the HsCKK domain can differentiate subtly specific tubulin conformations to enable microtubule minus-end recognition.

Indexed as

Cryoelectron MicroscopyHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMicrotubulesModels, MolecularNaegleriaProtein BindingProtein DomainsTubulinCAMSAP1 protein, humanMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsTubulin

Identifiers

PMID31748546
PMCPMC6868217
OpenAlexW2991157552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.