Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31748530›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Ranking of non-coding pathogenic variants and putative essential regions of the human genome.

Alex Wells, David Heckerman, Ali Torkamani, Li Yin, Jonathan Sebat, Bing Ren, Amalio Telenti, Julia di Iulio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Haplotype editing with CRISPR-Cas9 as a therapeutic approach for dominant-negative missense mutations in NEFL.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alex WellsStanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8558-9373
David HeckermanDepartment of Computer Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4274-6084
Ali TorkamaniScripps Research Translational Institute, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0232-8053
Li YinScripps Research Translational Institute, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2634-9158
Jonathan SebatBeyster Institute for Psychiatric Genomics, Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9087-526X
Bing RenLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5435-1127
Amalio Telenti *Scripps Research Translational Institute, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA. atelenti@scripps.edu.
Julia di Iulio *Scripps Research Translational Institute, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA. Julia.diiulio@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9343-127X

Funding

Scripps Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002550 · NCATS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI TOPOL, ERIC JEFFREY · 2018 to 2022
$28.9M
Expanding the accessible genetic architecture of autism by single molecule sequencingR01MH113715 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SEBAT, JONATHAN · 2017 to 2021
$4.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002550NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH113715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A gene is considered essential if loss of function results in loss of viability, fitness or in disease. This concept is well established for coding genes; however, non-coding regions are thought less likely to be determinants of critical functions. Here we train a machine learning model using functional, mutational and structural features, including new genome essentiality metrics, 3D genome organization and enhancer reporter data to identify deleterious variants in non-coding regions. We assess the model for functional correlates by using data from tiling-deletion-based and CRISPR interference screens of activity of cis-regulatory elements in over 3 Mb of genome sequence. Finally, we explore two user cases that involve indels and the disruption of enhancers associated with a developmental disease. We rank variants in the non-coding genome according to their predicted deleteriousness. The model prioritizes non-coding regions associated with regulation of important genes and with cell viability, an in vitro surrogate of essentiality.

Indexed as

Supervised Machine LearningChromatinComputer SimulationDNAEnhancer Elements, GeneticGene ExpressionGenes, ReporterGenetic VariationGenome, HumanHumansINDEL MutationIntronsMutationNucleic Acid ConformationChromatinDNA

Identifiers

PMID31748530
PMCPMC6868241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.