Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31748443›Full record

ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2020

The Current Status of Endovascular Treatment for Extracranial Steno-occlusive Diseases in Japan: Analysis Using the Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy 3 (JR-NET3).

Yukihiro Yamao, Akira Ishii, Tetsu Satow, Koji Iihara, Nobuyuki Sakai, Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy investigators

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Angioplasty versus stenting for subclavian artery stenosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yukihiro YamaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine.
Akira IshiiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine.
Tetsu SatowDepartment of Neurosurgery, National cerebral and Cardiovascular Center.
Koji IiharaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University.
Nobuyuki SakaiDepartment of Neuroendovascular Therapy, Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation.
Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy investigators
Kyoto University · JPFoundation for Biomedical Research and Innovation · JPKyushu University · JPNational Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endovascular treatment of extracranial steno-occlusive lesions is an alternative to direct surgery. There is no consensus regarding the natural course and standard treatment of these lesions. The aim of this study was to identify the current status of endovascular treatment for extracranial steno-occlusive lesions. A total of 1154 procedures for extracranial steno-occlusive lesions, except for internal carotid artery stenosis, were collected from the Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy 3 (JR-NET3). Atherosclerotic lesions were most frequent (1021 patients, 88.5%). Endovascular treatment was performed for 456 (39.5%) patients with subclavian artery, 349 (30.2%) with extracranial vertebral artery, 172 (14.9%) with the origin of common carotid artery, and 38 (3.3%) with innominate artery stenosis; the overall technical success rate was 98.0%. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was performed in 307 patients (26.6%) and stenting in 838 (72.6%). An embolic protection device (EPD) was used in 571 patients (49.5%), and procedure under general anesthesia was performed in 168 (14.6%). Preoperative antiplatelet therapy was administered in 1091 procedures (94.5%). A good outcome was obtained for 962 patients (83.4%). Complications were observed in 89 patients (7.7%). The procedure under general anesthesia was statistically significant factors (P <0.01), and also after multivariable adjustment (odds ratio 2.29; 95% confidence interval 1.25-4.17; P <0.01). Comparisons between JR-NET3 and previous cohorts (JR-NET1&2), the utilization of EPD and complications increased significantly, and the type of antiplatelet therapy changed markedly. Based on the results of this study, endovascular treatment for extracranial steno-occlusive lesions is relatively safe. Further prospective studies are necessary to validate the beneficial effects.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresAgedAged, 80 and overAnesthesia, GeneralAngioplastyArterial Occlusive DiseasesArteriosclerosisBrachiocephalic TrunkCarotid Artery, CommonCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFibrinolytic AgentsHumansIschemic Attack, TransientJapanMaleFibrinolytic AgentsPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitorsantiplatelet therapyembolic protection devicesubclavian artery stenosisvertebral artery stenosis

Identifiers

PMID31748443
PMCPMC6970071
OpenAlexW2990495520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.