ArticleBMJ open2019
Key diagnostic characteristics of fever of unknown origin in Japanese patients: a prospective multicentre study.
Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prospective Studies Comparing Structured vs Nonstructured Diagnostic Protocol Evaluations Among Patients With Fever of Unknown Origin: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA network open · 2022Pooled it
- Follow-up, diagnosis, and outcomes of fever of unknown origin cases in whom no diagnosis was established after initial evaluation: an ID-IRI (Infectious Diseases - International Research Initiative) observational retrospective cohort study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Observational
- Review
- Fever of unknown origin (FUO) FADOI-SIMIT Italian registry: can demographics, comorbidities, and clinical variables predict the etiology of classic FUO?-a prospective Italian study.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Observational
- Future threats: Animal orthoflaviviruses that currently infect fewer than 100 people per year.Cell reports · 2025Review
- Retrospective study on clinical value and optimal use of [Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Characteristics of Functional Hyperthermia Detected in an Outpatient Clinic for Fever of Unknown Origin.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Successful outcome in a case of idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease with atypical lymphadenopathy and kidney injury: Diagnostic challenges and treatment approach-Case report.SAGE open medical case reports · 2024Article
- Structured diagnostic scheme clinical experience sharing: a prospective study of 320 cases of fever of unknown origin in a tertiary hospital in North China.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Investigator-Determined Categories for Fever of Unknown Origin (FUO) Compared With International Classification of Diseases-10 Classification of Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis With a Proposal for Revised FUO Classification.Open forum infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Non-infectious diseases in infectious disease consultation: A descriptive study in a tertiary care teaching hospital.PloS one · 2023Article
- Optimal use of the FDG-PET/CT in the diagnostic process of fever of unknown origin (FUO): a comprehensive review.Japanese journal of radiology · 2022Review
- Fever of Unknown Origin and Hepatitis as the Initial Presentation of Anti-MDA-5 Positive Dermatomyositis: A Case Report.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2022Article
- Geographic Influence Upon Noninfectious Diseases Accounting for Fever of Unknown Origin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Open forum infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Clinical perspectives and therapeutic strategies: pediatric autoinflammatory disease-a multi-faceted approach to fever of unknown origin of childhood.Inflammation and regeneration · 2022Review
- Geographic Variation of Infectious Disease Diagnoses Among Patients With Fever of Unknown Origin: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Open forum infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Pseudogout as a Cause of Fever of Unknown Origin Following Staphylococcal Bacteremia in an Older Patient.Cureus · 2022Article
- Article
- Fever of unknown origin (FUO) in children: a single-centre experience from Beijing, China.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Outcomes of General Internal Medicine Consultations for Diagnosis from Specialists in a Tertiary Hospital: A Retrospective Observational Study.International journal of general medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify the key diagnostic features and causes of fever of unknown origin (FUO) in Japanese patients.
designMulticentre prospective study.
settingSixteen hospitals affiliated with the Japanese Society of Hospital General Medicine, covering the East and West regions of Japan.
participantsPatient aged ≥20 years diagnosed with classic FUO (axillary temperature≥38.0°C at least twice within a 3-week period, cause unknown after three outpatient visits or 3 days of hospitalisation). A total of 141 cases met the criteria and were recruited from January 2016 to December 2017.
interventionJapanese standard diagnostic examinations. OUTCOME MEASURES: Data collected include usual biochemical blood tests, inflammatory markers (erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C reactive (CRP) protein level, procalcitonin level), imaging results, autopsy findings (if performed) and final diagnosis.
resultsThe most frequent age group was 65-79 years old (mean: 58.6±9.1 years). The most frequent cause of FUO was non-infectious inflammatory disease. After a 6-month follow-up period, 21.3% of cases remained undiagnosed. The types of diseases causing FUO were significantly correlated with age and prognosis. Between patients with and without a final diagnosis, there was no difference in CRP level between patients with and without a final diagnosis (p=0.121). A significant difference in diagnosis of a causative disease was found between patients who did or did not receive an ESR test (p=0.041). Of the 35 patients with an abnormal ESR value, 28 (80%) had causative disease identified.
conclusionsAge may be a key factor in the differential diagnosis of FUO; the ESR test may be of value in the FUO evaluation process. These results may provide clinicians with insight into the management of FUO to allow adequate treatment according to the cause of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.