Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31748295›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Recruiting hard to reach populations to studies: breaking the silence: an example from a study that recruited people with dementia.

Becky Field, Gail Mountain, Jane Burgess, Laura Di Bona, Daniel Kelleher, Jacqueline Mundy, Jennifer Wenborn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Engaging With a Community of Practice in Dementia: Impacts on Skills, Knowledge, Networks and Accessing Support.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Becky FieldSchool of Health and Related Research, Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK b.field@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3502-2691
Gail MountainSchool of Health and Related Research, Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Jane BurgessResearch and Development Department, North East London NHS Foundation Trust Goodmayes Hospital, Ilford, Essex, UK.
Laura Di BonaSchool of Health and Related Research, Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Daniel KelleherResearch and Development Department, Humber Teaching NHS Foundation Trust, Willerby, UK.
Jacqueline MundyEngagement and Experience Team, Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Jennifer WenbornResearch and Development Department, North East London NHS Foundation Trust Goodmayes Hospital, Ilford, Essex, UK.

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0610-10108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo share the challenges of recruiting people with dementia to studies, using experiences from one recently completed trial as an exemplar.

backgroundResearch publications always cite participant numbers but the effort expended to achieve the sample size is rarely reported, even when the study involved recruiting a hard to reach population. A multisite study of a psychosocial intervention for people with dementia illustrates the challenges. This study recruited 468 'dyads' (a person with dementia and a family carer together) from 15 sites but the time taken to achieve this was longer than originally estimated. This led to a study extension and the need for additional sites. Recruitment data revealed that certain sites were more successful than others, but why? Can the knowledge gained be used to inform other studies?

methodsSecondary analysis of routinely collected recruitment data from three purposefully selected sites was examined to understand the strategies used and identify successful approaches.

findingsAt all three sites, the pool of potential recruits funnelled to a few participants. It took two sites 18 months longer than the third to achieve recruitment numbers despite additional efforts. Explanations given by potential participants for declining to take part included ill health, reporting they were 'managing', time constraints, adjusting to a diagnosis of dementia and burden of study procedures.

conclusionsSuccessful recruitment of people with dementia to studies, as one example of a hard to reach group, requires multiple strategies and close working between researchers and clinical services. It requires a detailed understanding of the needs and perspectives of the specific population and knowledge about how individuals can be supported to participate in research. Experiences of recruitment should be disseminated so that knowledge generated can be used to inform the planning and implementation of future research studies.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversClinical Trials as TopicDementiaFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicOccupational TherapyPatient Acceptance of Health CarePilot Projectsdementiaparticipationpsychosocial interventionsrecruitmentresearch methods

Identifiers

PMID31748295
PMCPMC6886904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.