Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31748254›Full record

Trial reportPediatrics2019

Prenatal and Infancy Nurse Home Visiting and 18-Year Outcomes of a Randomized Trial.

Harriet Kitzman, David L Olds, Michael D Knudtson, Robert Cole, Elizabeth Anson, Joyce A Smith, Diana Fishbein, Ralph DiClemente, Gina Wingood, Angela M Caliendo and 3 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Annual Research Review: Beyond the target - understanding crossover effects in family-centered prevention.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2026
    Review
  6. Annual Research Review: Early conduct problems - precursors, outcomes, and etiology.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Criminal Legal System Experiences Among Families Receiving Home Visiting Services: A Scoping Review of the Literature.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2025
    Article
  10. Call to Action to Quantify Non-Severe and Severe Maternal Morbidity.Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Early preventive services in Germany-perspectives for future development].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. A new era in child maltreatment prevention: call to action.The Medical journal of Australia · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Harriet KitzmanSchool of Nursing, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
David L OldsDepartments of Pediatrics and david.olds@cuanschutz.edu.
Michael D KnudtsonDepartments of Pediatrics and.
Robert ColeSchool of Nursing, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Elizabeth AnsonSchool of Nursing, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Joyce A SmithSchool of Nursing, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Diana FishbeinEdna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research Center, Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania.
Ralph DiClementeCollege of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York.
Gina WingoodMailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Angela M CaliendoWarren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Christian HopferPsychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
Ted MillerPacific Institute for Research and Evaluation and School of Public Health, Curtin University, Beltsville, Maryland; and.
Gabriella ContiDepartments of Economics and Social Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Age-17 Follow-up of Home Visiting InterventionR01DA021624 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI OLDS, DAVID L · 2008 to 2012
$8.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA021624
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesGiven earlier effects found in randomized clinical trials of the Nurse-Family Partnership, we examined whether this program would improve 18-year-old first-born youths' cognition, academic achievement, and behavior and whether effects on cognitive-related outcomes would be greater for youth born to mothers with limited psychological resources (LPR) and on arrests and convictions among females.

methodsWe enrolled 742 pregnant, low-income women with no previous live births and randomly assigned them to receive either free transportation for prenatal care plus child development screening and referral (control;

resultsCompared with control-group counterparts, NV youth born to mothers with LPR had better receptive language (effect size = 0.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.00 to 0.47;

conclusionsThe program improved the cognitive-related skills of 18-year-olds born to mothers with LPR and, as a trend, reduced female convictions but produced no other effects on youth behavioral health.

Indexed as

AdolescentCognitionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth Risk BehaviorsHome Care ServicesHouse CallsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleNurses, Community HealthPovertyPregnancyPrenatal CareTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID31748254
PMCPMC6889968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.