Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31747932›Full record

Observational studyBMC health services research2019

Towards improved health service quality in Tanzania: contribution of a supportive supervision approach to increased quality of primary healthcare.

Sabine Renggli, Iddy Mayumana, Dominick Mboya, Christopher Charles, Christopher Mshana, Flora Kessy, Tracy R Glass, Christian Lengeler, Alexander Schulze, Ann Aerts and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sabine RenggliDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, P.O. Box, 4002, Basel, Switzerland. sabine.renggli@bluewin.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8233-6154
Iddy MayumanaIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam/Ifakara, United Republic of Tanzania.
Dominick MboyaIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam/Ifakara, United Republic of Tanzania.
Christopher CharlesIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam/Ifakara, United Republic of Tanzania.
Christopher MshanaIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam/Ifakara, United Republic of Tanzania.
Flora KessyIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam/Ifakara, United Republic of Tanzania.
Tracy R GlassDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, P.O. Box, 4002, Basel, Switzerland.
Christian LengelerDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, P.O. Box, 4002, Basel, Switzerland.
Alexander SchulzeSwiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, Berne, Switzerland.
Ann AertsNovartis Foundation, Basel, Switzerland.
Constanze PfeifferDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, P.O. Box, 4002, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

Novartis Foundation NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUniversal Health Coverage only leads to the desired health outcomes if quality of health services is ensured. In Tanzania, quality has been a major concern for many years, including the problem of ineffective and inadequate routine supportive supervision of healthcare providers by council health management teams. To address this, we developed and assessed an approach to improve quality of primary healthcare through enhanced routine supportive supervision.

methodsMixed methods were used, combining trends of quantitative quality of care measurements with qualitative data mainly collected through in-depth interviews. The former allowed for identification of drivers of quality improvements and the latter investigated the perceived contribution of the new supportive supervision approach to these improvements.

resultsThe results showed that the new approach managed to address quality issues that could be solved either solely by the healthcare provider, or in collaboration with the council. The new approach was able to improve and maintain crucial primary healthcare quality standards across different health facility level and owner categories in various contexts.

conclusionTogether with other findings reported in companion papers, we could show that the new supportive supervision approach not only served to assess quality of primary healthcare, but also to improve and maintain crucial primary healthcare quality standards. The new approach therefore presents a powerful tool to support, guide and drive quality improvement measures within council. It can thus be considered a suitable option to make routine supportive supervision more effective and adequate.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHealth FacilitiesHealth PersonnelHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareQuality ImprovementElectronic toolQuality improvement approachQuality of careSupportive supervisionTanzaniaUniversal health coverage

Identifiers

PMID31747932
PMCPMC6865029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.