Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31747917›Full record

SynthesisBMC emergency medicine2019

Effectiveness of interventions to alleviate emergency department crowding by older adults: a systematic review.

Gijs Hesselink, Özcan Sir, Yvonne Schoon

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC emergency medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gijs HesselinkEmergency Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, P.O. Box 9101, 114 IQ healthcare, Nijmegen, HB, 6500, The Netherlands. gijs.hesselink@radboudumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-2532-0724
Özcan SirEmergency Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, P.O. Box 9101, 114 IQ healthcare, Nijmegen, HB, 6500, The Netherlands.
Yvonne SchoonEmergency Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, P.O. Box 9101, 114 IQ healthcare, Nijmegen, HB, 6500, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe growing demand for elderly care often exceeds the ability of emergency department (ED) services to provide quality of care within reasonable time. The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the effectiveness of interventions on reducing ED crowding by older patients, and to identify core characteristics shared by successful interventions.

methodsSix major biomedical databases were searched for (quasi)experimental studies published between January 1990 and March 2017 and assessing the effect of interventions for older patients on ED crowding related outcomes. Two independent reviewers screened and selected studies, assessed risk of bias and extracted data into a standardized form. Data were synthesized around the study setting, design, quality, intervention content, type of outcome and observed effects.

resultsOf the 16 included studies, eight (50%) were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), two (13%) were non-RCTs and six (34%) were controlled before-after (CBA) studies. Thirteen studies (81%) evaluated effects on ED revisits and four studies (25%) evaluated effects on ED throughput time. Thirteen studies (81%) described multicomponent interventions. The rapid assessment and streaming of care for older adults based on time-efficiency goals by dedicated staff in a specific ED unit lead to a statistically significant decrease of ED length of stay (LOS). An ED-based consultant geriatrician showed significant time reduction between patient admission and geriatric review compared to an in-reaching geriatrician.

conclusionInter-study heterogeneity and poor methodological quality hinder drawing firm conclusions on the intervention's effectiveness in reducing ED crowding by older adults. More evidence-based research is needed using uniform and valid effect measures.

trial registrationThe protocol is registered with the PROSPERO International register of systematic reviews: ID = CRD42017075575).

Indexed as

CrowdingAgedAged, 80 and overEmergency Service, HospitalGeriatric AssessmentHumansLength of StayPatient Care TeamQuality of Health CareTime FactorsTime-to-TreatmentTriageWorkflowEmergency department crowdingOlder adultsSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31747917
PMCPMC6864956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.