Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31747906›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2019

The impact of gender and academic achievement on the violation of academic integrity for medical faculty students, a descriptive cross-sectional survey study.

Müesser Özcan, Neşe Yeniçeri, Edip Güvenç Çekiç

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Müesser ÖzcanThe Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical History and Ethics, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Kötekli Mahallesi Marmaris Yolu Bulvarı No:50, 48000, Menteşe, Muğla, Turkey. muglabiyomer@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2401-7101
Neşe YeniçeriThe Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Kötekli Mahallesi Marmaris Yolu Bulvarı No:50, 48000, Menteşe, Muğla, Turkey.
Edip Güvenç ÇekiçThe Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Pharmacology, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Kötekli Mahallesi Marmaris Yolu Bulvarı No:50, 48000, Menteşe, Muğla, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5605-1953

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study is to determine the characteristics of medical faculty students about violations of academic integrity.

methodFrom the whole population of the 572 students of the Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Faculty of Medicine, 271 students participated voluntarily in a descriptive cross-sectional survey. Descriptive data were recorded in the survey and a five-point Likert-type instrument, namely the Tendency towards Academic Dishonesty Scale, was used as the data collection tool in the study. The scale included 22 items' means that are considered to evaluate "Tendency towards academic dishonesty" (TTAD) score. In addition, four subscales, namely "Tendency towards cheating", "Dishonesty in works such as assignments and projects", "Tendency towards dishonesty in research and reporting processes" and "Tendency towards citation dishonesty" scores were evaluated separately.

resultsOf the participants, 138 (53.3%) were male. TTAD scores were 2.15 ± 0.61, showing a slight tendency towards academic dishonesty, according to the scale. TTAD scores and standard deviations (SD) were 2.26 ± 0.65 and 2.04 ± 0.55 for men and women, respectively (P = 0.005). There was no difference in the TTAD scores for students whether they had read the ethics code. Significant differences were observed in the TTAD scores for students with gender, different academic achievements and in different academic years. However, when multivariate analysis was performed, the significance shown in the results disappeared.

conclusionIn our study, a slight tendency to academic dishonesty was found for medical faculty students and there were no differences between all of the recorded individual factors of students.

Indexed as

Academic SuccessDeceptionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSex FactorsStudents, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesAcademic integrityDishonestyMedical students

Identifiers

PMID31747906
PMCPMC6864937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.