Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31747894›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2019

Evaluation of free and total fluoride concentration in mouthwashes via measurement with ion-selective electrode.

Vladimir Yu Reshetnyak, Olga V Nesterova, Oleg I Admakin, Denis A Dobrokhotov, Irina N Avertseva, Samira A Dostdar, Dinara F Khakimova

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Recent Biomarkers for Monitoring the Systemic Fluoride Levels in Exposed Populations: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vladimir Yu ReshetnyakDepartment of Chemistry in the Institute of Pharmacy, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Olga V NesterovaDepartment of Chemistry in the Institute of Pharmacy, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Oleg I AdmakinDepartment of Prevention and Communal Dentistry, Institute of Dentistry, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Denis A DobrokhotovDepartment of Chemistry in the Institute of Pharmacy, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Irina N AvertsevaDepartment of Chemistry in the Institute of Pharmacy, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Samira A Dostdar5th year undergraduate student of the Institute of Pharmacy, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Dinara F KhakimovaDepartment of Prevention and Communal Dentistry, Institute of Dentistry, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia. dr.khakimova@gmail.com.
Sechenov University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to compare free fluoride concentration and total fluoride concentration in mouthwashes.

methodsFluorine-containing mouthwashes from various companies and manufacturers (Colgate Total Plax Classic Mint®, Colgate-Palmolive, New York, USA; Colgate Total Plax Gentle Mint®, Colgate-Palmolive, New York, USA; Colgate Total Plax Fresh Mint®, Colgate-Palmolive, New York, USA; Oral B Advantage®, Procter&Gamble, Cincinnati, USA; Reach Fresh Mint®, Johnson&Johnson, New Brunswick, USA; Foramen®, Laboratorios Foramen, Guarnizo, Spain; Lacalut Sensitive®, Dr. THEISS, Homburg, Germany; Sensodyne®, GlaxoSmithKline, London, UK; Vesna F®, Vita, Saint Petersburg, Russia; Lacalut Fresh®, Dr. THEISS, Homburg, Germany) were selected as study objects. Fluoride measurements were carried out using the fluoride selective electrode.

resultsFree fluoride:total fluoride ratio was more than 80% for six samples (Colgate Total Plax Gentle Mint® - 88%, Colgate Total Plax Fresh Mint® - 99%, Oral B Advantage® - 92%, Reach Fresh Mint® - 92 and 89% for the mouthwash of another batch, Lacalut Sensitive® - 94%) and less than 63% for three samples (Colgate Total Plax Classic Mint® - 56%, Foramen® - 62%, Vesna F® - 61%). Two samples had more than 70% and less than 80% of unbound fluoride, respectively (Sensodyne® - 77%, another batch of Oral B Advantage® mouthwash - 74%). Rinse containing sodium monofluorophosphate (Na

conclusionsThe differences in free fluoride: total fluoride ratio between analyzed mouthwashes reveal a need to develop a method for evaluation of free fluorides in mouthwashes for proper updating of national and international guidelines.

Indexed as

Ion-Selective ElectrodesPotentiometryFluoridesHumansMouthwashesFluoridesMouthwashesFluoridesIon-selective electrodeMouthwashesPotentiometry

Identifiers

PMID31747894
PMCPMC6868805
OpenAlexW2990819177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.