ArticleTurkish journal of urology2020
3D printing of pelvic fracture urethral injuries-fusion of technology and urethroplasty.
Article in Turkish journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in urethral stricture diagnostics and urethral reconstruction beyond traditional imaging: a scoping review.Central European journal of urology · 2024Review
- Application of 3D printed pelvic fracture related urethra and surrounding tissue as preoperative planning model.BMC urology · 2023Article
- Challenging the dogma of 6 steps for anastomotic urethroplasty in posterior urethral stricture: introducing step 3a.World journal of urology · 2022Article
- Redo pelvic fracture urethral injury repair: The case for tadalafil.Turkish journal of urology · 2021Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging procedure for pelvic fracture urethral injuries and recto urethral fistulas: A simplified protocol.Turkish journal of urology · 2021Article
- The Role of 3D-Printed Phantoms and Devices for Organ-specified Appliances in Urology.International journal of bioprinting · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveUrethral injury occurs in 10% of patients who suffer from pelvic fractures. Urethroplasty is performed after an interval of 3 months to stabilize the perineal hematoma. It has been reported that the rate limiting step in anastomotic urethroplasty is finding the posterior urethra. Even for the most experienced surgeons, at times, this step can be challenging. The aim of the present study was to describe a novel technique for understanding the three-dimensional (3D) anatomy which would also help in surgical planning and making urethroplasty easy, a step ahead of conventional imaging. MATERIAL AND
methodsOurs is a tertiary referral center with an experience of >1307 cases of pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects. This study was conducted between January 2018 and July 2018. Ethics approval was obtained. No patients incurred any cost for the study. A computerized tomography scan was performed with the bladder filled with contrast saline, and the same solution was injected into the anterior urethra, with a gauze piece tied around the glans. 3D images were then reconstructed, and data were transferred to the 3D Ultimaker™ printer. 3D models were printed to mimic the anatomy of pelvic fracture urethral distraction.
resultsA total of 10 models were created. The models, along with conventional urethrogram, were shown to fellows and observers. Visually, they gave a score of 4.3/5. In correlation with urethroplasty, understanding the anatomy of the posterior urethra was also important.
conclusion3D printing can be applied to pelvic fracture urethral injury to understand the anatomy of the posterior urethra, its distance from the rectum, length of gap, relation to the posterior urethra, direction of displacement of the urethra, and if pubectomy is required or not.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.