ArticleJAMA network open2019
Contemporary Views of Research Participant Willingness to Participate and Share Digital Data in Biomedical Research.
Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Email-Based Recruitment Into the Health eHeart Study: Cohort Analysis of Invited Eligible Patients.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Diverse Recruitment for Clinical Trials Using Three Diversity-Enhancing Interventions: Qualitative Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- How and Who? Examining Real-World Evidence of Engagement and Use of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Smartphone Application in Routine Clinical Care for Patients With Inflammatory Arthritides.ACR open rheumatology · 2025Article
- Comparative Assessment of Multimodal Sensor Data Quality Collected Using Android and iOS Smartphones in Real-World Settings.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- An Integrative Engagement Model of Digital Psychotherapy: Exploratory Focus Group Findings.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Association of Demographic and Socioeconomic Indicators With the Use of Wearable Devices Among Children.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Attitudes Toward Personal Health Data Sharing Among People Living With Sickle Cell Disorder, Exemplar for Study of Rare Disease Populations.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2023Article
- Collaborative development of an innovative virtual research recruitment strategy through an academic/clinical partnership.Applied nursing research : ANR · 2022Article
- Recruitment and Retention in Remote Research: Learnings From a Large, Decentralized Real-world Study.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- The use of online social media for the recruitment of people living with HIV in Spain and Latin America: Lessons from two studies.Health & social care in the community · 2022Article
- Patient Onboarding and Engagement to Build a Digital Study After Enrollment in a Clinical Trial (TAILOR-PCI Digital Study): Intervention Study.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- Participant retention in a fully remote trial of digital psychotherapy: Comparison of incentive types.Frontiers in digital health · 2022Article
- Public Attitudes to Digital Health Research Repositories: Cross-sectional International Survey.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Willingness to Share Wearable Device Data for Research Among Mechanical Turk Workers: Web-Based Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Perceived Utility and Characterization of Personal Google Search Histories to Detect Data Patterns Proximal to a Suicide Attempt in Individuals Who Previously Attempted Suicide: Pilot Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Using Real-world Data for Decision Support: Recommendations from a Primary Care Provider Survey.The Permanente journal · 2021Article
- Individuals with depression express more distorted thinking on social media.Nature human behaviour · 2021Article
- Artificial Intelligence: An Interprofessional Perspective on Implications for Geriatric Mental Health Research and Care.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Barriers to emergency department usage during the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Using social media to recruit participants is a common and cost-effective practice. Willingness to participate (WTP) in biomedical research is a function of trust in the scientific team, which is closely tied to the source of funding and institutional connections. Objective: To determine whether WTP and willingness to share social media data are associated with the type of research team and online recruitment platform. Design, Setting, and Participants: This mixed-methods longitudinal survey and qualitative study was conducted over 2 points (T1 and T2) using Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk) platform. Participants were US adults aged 18 years or older who use at least 1 social media platform. Recruitment was stratified to match race/ethnicity proportions of the 2010 US Census. The volunteer sample consisted of 914 participants at T1, and 655 participants completed the follow-up survey 5 months later (T2). Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes were (1) past experience with online research and sharing social media data for research; (2) WTP in research advertised online; (3) WTP in a study sponsored by a pharmaceutical company, a university, or a federal agency; and (4) willingness to share social media data. Opinions were solicited regarding the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation statute, which came into effect between T1 and T2. Results: Of 914 participants completing the first survey (T1), 604 (66.1%) were aged 18 to 39 years and 494 (54.0%) were female. Of these, 655 participants (71.7%) responded at T2. While 680 participants (74.4%) indicated WTP in biomedical research, only 454 (49.3%) were willing to share their social media data. Participants were significantly less likely to participate in federally sponsored (odds ratio [OR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.51-0.64; P < .001) or pharmaceutical company (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.53-0.66; P < .001) research than university-led studies. They were also less likely to share their social medial data for federal (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.58-0.72; P < .001) or pharmaceutical company (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.44-0.56; P < .001) research compared with academic studies. Willingness to participate in pharmaceutical company-led research decreased 11.89% from T1 to T2 (OR for T2, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.54-0.77; P < .001). Reasons for WTP were interest in furthering science, financial incentives, trust in the organization, and data security. While 63.0% of respondents reported seeing new privacy policy emails related to the General Data Protection Regulation law, only 27.1% indicated this positively influenced their WTP. Thematic analysis of responses indicated that WTP may improve with stronger data security measures. Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that researchers may see reduced online research participation and data sharing, particularly for research conducted outside academia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.