Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31747031›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2019

Contemporary Views of Research Participant Willingness to Participate and Share Digital Data in Biomedical Research.

Abhishek Pratap, Ryan Allred, Jaden Duffy, Donovan Rivera, Heather Sophia Lee, Brenna N Renn, Patricia A Areán

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Barriers to emergency department usage during the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Abhishek PratapDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle.
Ryan AllredDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.
Jaden DuffyDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.
Donovan RiveraDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Heather Sophia LeeDepartment of Family Medicine & Community Health, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Brenna N RennDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.
Patricia A AreánDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.
University of Washington · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USSage Bionetworks · US

Funding

UW ALACRITY Center for Psychosocial Interventions ResearchP50MH115837 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI IAN Moore BENNETT · 2018 to 2026
$18.2M
A Computerized Intervention Targeting Cognitive Control Network Deficits in DepressionR33MH110509 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ANGUERA, JOAQUIN A, AREAN, PATRICIA A. · 2018 to 2020
$2.0M
2/2 Stepped, reward-exposure based therapy vs. PST in late life depressionR01MH102304 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI AREAN, PATRICIA A. · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH115837NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH102304NIMH NIH HHS R33 MH110509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Using social media to recruit participants is a common and cost-effective practice. Willingness to participate (WTP) in biomedical research is a function of trust in the scientific team, which is closely tied to the source of funding and institutional connections. Objective: To determine whether WTP and willingness to share social media data are associated with the type of research team and online recruitment platform. Design, Setting, and Participants: This mixed-methods longitudinal survey and qualitative study was conducted over 2 points (T1 and T2) using Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk) platform. Participants were US adults aged 18 years or older who use at least 1 social media platform. Recruitment was stratified to match race/ethnicity proportions of the 2010 US Census. The volunteer sample consisted of 914 participants at T1, and 655 participants completed the follow-up survey 5 months later (T2). Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes were (1) past experience with online research and sharing social media data for research; (2) WTP in research advertised online; (3) WTP in a study sponsored by a pharmaceutical company, a university, or a federal agency; and (4) willingness to share social media data. Opinions were solicited regarding the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation statute, which came into effect between T1 and T2. Results: Of 914 participants completing the first survey (T1), 604 (66.1%) were aged 18 to 39 years and 494 (54.0%) were female. Of these, 655 participants (71.7%) responded at T2. While 680 participants (74.4%) indicated WTP in biomedical research, only 454 (49.3%) were willing to share their social media data. Participants were significantly less likely to participate in federally sponsored (odds ratio [OR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.51-0.64; P < .001) or pharmaceutical company (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.53-0.66; P < .001) research than university-led studies. They were also less likely to share their social medial data for federal (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.58-0.72; P < .001) or pharmaceutical company (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.44-0.56; P < .001) research compared with academic studies. Willingness to participate in pharmaceutical company-led research decreased 11.89% from T1 to T2 (OR for T2, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.54-0.77; P < .001). Reasons for WTP were interest in furthering science, financial incentives, trust in the organization, and data security. While 63.0% of respondents reported seeing new privacy policy emails related to the General Data Protection Regulation law, only 27.1% indicated this positively influenced their WTP. Thematic analysis of responses indicated that WTP may improve with stronger data security measures. Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that researchers may see reduced online research participation and data sharing, particularly for research conducted outside academia.

Indexed as

AttitudeBiomedical ResearchInformation DisseminationSocial MediaAdolescentAdultAgedComputer SecurityFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchResearch SubjectsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID31747031
PMCPMC6902809
OpenAlexW2990763425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.