Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31746961›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2020

Protein docking model evaluation by 3D deep convolutional neural networks.

Xiao Wang, Genki Terashi, Charles W Christoffer, Mengmeng Zhu, Daisuke Kihara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. AI-Driven De Novo Binder Design: From Structure Prediction to Closed-Loop Optimization.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. ZEPPI: Proteome-scale sequence-based evaluation of protein-protein interaction models.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Machine Learning Methods in Protein-Protein Docking.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiao WangDepartment of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Genki TerashiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Charles W ChristofferDepartment of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Mengmeng ZhuDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Daisuke KiharaDepartment of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.

Funding

Purdue University Molecular Biophysics Training ProgramT32GM132024 · NIGMS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI Angeline Marie Lyon, John Tesmer · 2019 to 2026
$2.0M
Structural Modeling of Multifarious Protein ComplexesR01GM123055 · NIGMS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI KIHARA, DAISUKE · 2017 to 2020
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM123055NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM132024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationMany important cellular processes involve physical interactions of proteins. Therefore, determining protein quaternary structures provide critical insights for understanding molecular mechanisms of functions of the complexes. To complement experimental methods, many computational methods have been developed to predict structures of protein complexes. One of the challenges in computational protein complex structure prediction is to identify near-native models from a large pool of generated models.

resultsWe developed a convolutional deep neural network-based approach named DOcking decoy selection with Voxel-based deep neural nEtwork (DOVE) for evaluating protein docking models. To evaluate a protein docking model, DOVE scans the protein-protein interface of the model with a 3D voxel and considers atomic interaction types and their energetic contributions as input features applied to the neural network. The deep learning models were trained and validated on docking models available in the ZDock and DockGround databases. Among the different combinations of features tested, almost all outperformed existing scoring functions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Codes available at http://github.com/kiharalab/DOVE, http://kiharalab.org/dove/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID31746961
PMCPMC7141855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.