Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31746520›Full record

ArticleCancer science2020

Quantitative monitoring of circulating tumor DNA in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer undergoing chemotherapy.

Makoto Sugimori, Kazuya Sugimori, Hiromi Tsuchiya, Yoshimasa Suzuki, Sho Tsuyuki, Yoshihiro Kaneta, Akane Hirotani, Katsuyuki Sanga, Yuichiro Tozuka, Satoshi Komiyama and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. The Prognostic Impact of Early ctDNA Kinetics in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Using the ctDNA-RECIST.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  9. ctDNA in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Critical Appraisal.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Role of molecular biology in the management of pancreatic cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Makoto SugimoriDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5272-5167
Kazuya SugimoriGastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Hiromi TsuchiyaGastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Yoshimasa SuzukiGastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Sho TsuyukiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Yoshihiro KanetaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Akane HirotaniGastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Katsuyuki SangaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Yuichiro TozukaGastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Satoshi KomiyamaGastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Takeshi SatoGastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5836-7273
Shun TezukaGastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Yoshihiro GodaGastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Kuniyasu IrieDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Haruo MiwaGastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Yuuki MiuraGastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Tomohiro IshiiGastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Takashi KanekoGastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Masatsugu NagahamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Wataru ShibataDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Akito NozakiGastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Shin MaedaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.

Funding

Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI) 17K09465Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to cancer genome sequences, more than 90% of cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) harbor active KRAS mutations. Digital PCR (dPCR) enables accurate detection and quantification of rare mutations. We assessed the dynamics of circulating tumor DNA (ct-DNA) in patients with advanced PDAC undergoing chemotherapy using dPCR. KRAS G12/13 mutation was assayed by dPCR in 47 paired tissue- and ct-DNA samples. The 21 patients were subjected to quantitative ct-DNA monitoring at 4 to 8-week intervals during chemotherapy. KRAS mutation was detected in 45 of those 47 patients using tissue DNA. In the KRAS mutation-negative cases, next-generation sequencing revealed KRAS Q61K and NRAS Q61R mutations. KRAS mutation was detected in 23/45 cases using ct-DNA (liver or lung metastasis, 18/19; mutation allele frequency [MAF], 0.1%-31.7%; peritoneal metastasis, 3/9 [0.1%], locally advanced, 2/17 [0.1%-0.2%]). In the ct-DNA monitoring, the MAF value changed in concordance with the disease state. In the 6 locally advanced cases, KRAS mutation appeared concurrently with liver metastasis. Among the 6 cases with liver metastasis, KRAS mutation disappeared during the duration of stable disease or a partial response, and reappeared at the time of progressive disease. The median progression-free survival was longer in cases in which KRAS mutation disappeared after an initial course of chemotherapy than in those in which it was continuously detected (248.5 vs 50 days, P < .001). Therefore, ct-DNA monitoring enables continuous assessment of disease state and could have prognostic utility during chemotherapy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCirculating Tumor DNADNAEvaluation Studies as TopicFemaleGene FrequencyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLiver NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMutationBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNADNAbiomarkercirculating tumor DNAdigital PCRKRASpancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Identifiers

PMID31746520
PMCPMC6942439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.