Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31745984›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2019

Prenatal administration of progestogens for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy.

Jodie M Dodd, Rosalie M Grivell, Cecelia M OBrien, Therese Dowswell, Andrea R Deussen

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Universal cervical-length screening to prevent preterm birth in twin pregnancy: cost-utility analysis.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Article
  7. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. A nomogram to predict preterm birth in twin pregnancies.American journal of translational research · 2022
    Article
  11. FIGO good practice recommendations on progestogens for prevention of preterm delivery.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jodie M DoddThe University of Adelaide, Women's and Children's Hospital, School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 72 King William Road, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 5006.
Rosalie M GrivellFlinders University and Flinders Medical Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia, SA 5042.
Cecelia M OBrienRobinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Women's and Babies Division, Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Brougham Place, North Adelaide, SA, Australia, 5006.
Therese DowswellThe University of Liverpool, C/o Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Department of Women's and Children's Health, First Floor, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Crown Street, Liverpool, UK, L8 7SS.
Andrea R DeussenThe University of Adelaide, Women's and Children's Hospital, School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 72 King William Road, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 5006.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple pregnancy is a strong risk factor for preterm birth, and more than 50% of women with a twin pregnancy will give birth prior to 37 weeks' gestation. Infants born preterm are recognised to be at increased risk of many adverse health outcomes, contributing to more than half of overall perinatal mortality. Progesterone is produced naturally in the body and has a role in maintaining pregnancy, although it is not clear whether administering progestogens to women with multiple pregnancy at high risk of early birth is effective and safe. Since publication of the review update in 2019 readers are alerted that the study awaiting classification El-Refaie 2016, has been retracted [El-Refaie 2021]. The study has been moved to Excluded Studies table and the review amended accordingly.

objectivesTo assess the benefits and harms of progesterone administration for the prevention of preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (1 November 2016) and reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials examining the administration of a progestogen by any route for the prevention of preterm birth in women with multiple pregnancy. We did not include quasi-randomised or cross-over studies. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed reports identified by the search for eligibility, extracted data, assessed risk of bias and graded the quality of the evidence. MAIN

resultsWe included 16 trials, which all compared either vaginal progesterone or intramuscular (IM) 17‐hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17‐OHPC) with a placebo or no treatment, and involved a total of 4548 women. The risk of bias for the majority of included studies was low, with the exception of three studies that had inadequate blinding, or significant loss to follow‐up or both, or were not reported well enough for us to make a judgement. We graded the evidence low to high quality, with downgrading for statistical heterogeneity, design limitations in some of the studies contributing data, and imprecision of the effect estimate. 1 IM 17‐OHPC versus no treatment or placebo More women delivered at less than 34 weeks' gestation in the IM 17‐OHPC group compared with placebo (risk ratio (RR) 1.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06 to 2.26; women = 399; studies = 2; low‐quality evidence). Although the incidence of perinatal death in the 17‐OHPC group was higher, there was considerable uncertainty around the effect estimate and high heterogeneity between studies (average RR 1.45, 95% CI 0.60 to 3.51; infants = 3089; studies = 6; I2 = 71%; low‐quality evidence). No studies reported maternal mortality or major neurodevelopmental disability at childhood follow‐up. There were no clear group differences found in any of the other maternal or infant outcomes (preterm birth less than 37 weeks (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.13; women = 2010; studies = 5; high-quality evidence); preterm birth less than 28 weeks (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.55; women = 1920; studies = 5; moderate-quality evidence); infant birthweight less than 2500 g (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.08; infants = 4071; studies = 5; I AUTHORS'

conclusionsOverall, for women with a multiple pregnancy, the administration of progestogens (either IM 17‐OHPC or vaginal progesterone) does not appear to be associated with a reduction in risk of preterm birth or improved neonatal outcomes. Future research could focus on a comprehensive individual participant data meta-analysis including all of the available data relating to both IM 17‐OHPC and vaginal progesterone administration in women with a multiple pregnancy, before considering the need to conduct trials in subgroups of high-risk women (for example, women with a multiple pregnancy and a short cervical length identified on ultrasound).

Indexed as

FemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInjections, IntramuscularPerinatal MortalityPregnancyPregnancy, High-RiskPregnancy, MultiplePremature BirthProgestinsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicProgestins

Identifiers

PMID31745984
PMCPMC6864412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.