Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31745907›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2020

Oxaliplatin versus Mitomycin C following complete cytoreduction for colorectal peritoneal metastases: a comparative study.

Vignesh Narasimhan, Satish Warrier, Michael Michael, Robert Ramsay, Alexander Heriot

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review of 2022 PSOGI/RENAPE Consensus on HIPEC.Journal of surgical oncology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vignesh NarasimhanDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia. vigneshnaras@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8964-3082
Satish WarrierDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Michael MichaelDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Robert RamsayDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Alexander HeriotDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesCytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can offer selected patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM) a favorable long-term survival. While cytoreductive techniques are standardized, there remains great variability in HIPEC drugs with mitomycin C or oxaliplatin use based largely on institute preference. In this study, we compared outcomes based on mitomycin C or oxaliplatin use after complete cytoreduction.

methodsThis is a retrospective analysis over a 7-year period of all patients undergoing complete cytoreduction with HIPEC.

resultsSeventy-eight patients underwent complete cytoreduction with HIPEC during this time. Forty-six patients received oxaliplatin as HIPEC, and 32 received mitomycin C. There was no difference in patient characteristics, resections, or major morbidity between the two groups. Superficial wound infections were higher in the mitomycin C group (37.5% v 15.2%, p = 0.02). Median overall and disease-free survival for the entire cohort was 40 and 14 months, respectively. There was no difference in overall survival or disease-free survival between the two HIPEC groups (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.11-2.28).

conclusionComplete cytoreduction and HIPEC can offer selected patients a favorable survival. The choice of mitomycin C or oxaliplatin for HIPEC had no influence on survival. Prospective studies are needed to explore this important issue.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsHyperthermia, InducedPeritoneal NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresHumansMitomycinOxaliplatinProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateMitomycinOxaliplatinColorectal peritoneal metastasesCytoreductionHyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapyOxaliplatin HIPECPeritonectomy

Identifiers

PMID31745907
OpenAlexW2989770940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.