Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31745824›Full record

ArticleJournal of psycholinguistic research2020

Referent's Lexical Frequency Predicts Mismatch Negativity Responses to New Words Following Semantic Training.

Aleksander A Aleksandrov, Kristina S Memetova, Lyudmila N Stankevich, Veronika M Knyazeva, Yury Shtyrov

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Aleksander A AleksandrovLaboratory of Behavioural Neurodynamics, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Kristina S MemetovaDepartment of Higher Nervous Activity and Psychophysiology, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Lyudmila N StankevichDepartment of Higher Nervous Activity and Psychophysiology, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Veronika M KnyazevaLaboratory of Behavioural Neurodynamics, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Yury ShtyrovCentre of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience (CFIN), Aarhus University/Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, bld 1A, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark. yury@cfin.au.dk.
St Petersburg University · RUAarhus University Hospital · DK

Funding

Lundbeckfonden Grant R164-2013-15801Lundbeckfonden Project 18690RF P220 Framework Grant Contract No. 14.W03.31.0010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lexical ERPs (event-related potentials) obtained in an oddball paradigm were suggested to be an index of the formation of new word representations in the brain in the learning process: with increased exposure to new lexemes, the ERP amplitude grows, which is interpreted as a signature of a new memory-trace build-up and activation. Previous learning studies using this approach have, however, mostly used meaningless novel word forms; it therefore remains uncertain whether the increased amplitude simply reflects increased familiarity with the new stimulus or is indeed a reflection of a complete word representation. Here, we used the oddball paradigm to measure the mismatch negativity (MMN) responses to novel word forms before and after semantic training, during which they were associated with previously familiar words of either high or low frequency of occurrence. Following training, the amplitude of the MMN to novel words was enhanced. Furthermore, these changes were dependent on the frequency of the reference which novel items became associated with: namely, the MMN amplitude became greater and the latency shorter for the item which was assigned the high-frequency meaning. Even though the amount of training was the same for both types of items, the low-frequency stimulus did not achieve similar significant changes. Our results suggest that the new surface form becomes linked to the existing representation, which then automatically activates in full when the respective stimulus is present at the input. This finding indicates that the learning-related MMN dynamics, manifest as a response increase after learning, likely reflects the formation and activation of a complete lexicosemantic memory circuits for words.

Indexed as

SemanticsAdultAuditory PerceptionBrainEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleHumansLearningMaleMemoryRussiaElectroencephalography (EEG)Event-related potential (ERP)LearningLexical frequencyMismatch negativity (MMN)PlasticityRepresentationSemanticsWord

Identifiers

PMID31745824
OpenAlexW2990305655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.