ReviewNetherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation2020
Remote monitoring of chronic heart failure patients: invasive versus non-invasive tools for optimising patient management.
Review in Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Telemonitoring in Heart Failure: A Review of Monitoring Techniques and Clinical Outcomes.Cureus · 2026Review
- Collection of Ambulatory Electrocardiogram and Behavioral Data for the Identification of Digital Biomarkers for Heart Failure (CATCH-ECG): Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Invasive haemodynamic assessment in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.ESC heart failure · 2025Review
- Factors Influencing Adherence to Non-Invasive Telemedicine in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review.Clinics and practice · 2025Review
- Non-invasive heart failure monitoring: leveraging smart scales and digital biomarkers to improve heart failure outcomes.Heart failure reviews · 2024Review
- Remote Monitoring of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices in Very Elderly Patients: Advantages and Specific Problems.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- Implementation of an epicardial implantable MEMS sensor for continuous and real-time postoperative assessment of left ventricular activity in adult minipigs over a short- and long-term period.APL bioengineering · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Ambient Sensor Systems for the Early Detection of Heart Failure Decompensation in Older Patients Living at Home Alone: Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Characteristics Associated With Telemonitoring Use Among Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- The kinocardiograph for assessment of changes in haemodynamic load in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.ESC heart failure · 2021Article
- Automated Assessment of the Quality of Phonocardographic Recordings through Signal-to-Noise Ratio for Home Monitoring Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Clinical Update of the Latest Evidence for CardioMEMS Pulmonary Artery Pressure Monitoring in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure: A Promising System for Remote Heart Failure Care.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- The Future of Telemedicine in the Management of Heart Failure Patients.Cardiac failure review · 2021Review
- Wireless Hemodynamic Monitoring in Patients with Heart Failure.Current heart failure reports · 2021Review
- Case Report: Ambient Sensor Signals as Digital Biomarkers for Early Signs of Heart Failure Decompensation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
- Will the new decade bring home remote monitoring of heart failure patients?Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2020Article
- CardioMEMS: the next revolution in heart failure management?Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exacerbations of chronic heart failure (HF) with the necessity for hospitalisation impact hospital resources significantly. Despite all of the achievements in medical management and non-pharmacological therapy that improve the outcome in HF, new strategies are needed to prevent HF-related hospitalisations by keeping stable HF patients out of the hospital and focusing resources on unstable HF patients. Remote monitoring of these patients could provide the physicians with an additional tool to intervene adequately and promptly. Results of telemonitoring to date are inconsistent, especially those of telemonitoring with traditional non-haemodynamic parameters. Recently, the CardioMEMS device (Abbott Inc., Atlanta, GA, USA), an implantable haemodynamic remote monitoring sensor, has shown promising results in preventing HF-related hospitalisations in chronic HF patients hospitalised in the previous year and in New York Heart Association functional class III in the United States. This review provides an overview of the available evidence on remote monitoring in chronic HF patients and future perspectives for the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of these strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.