ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2019
Does energy consumption, financial development, and investment contribute to ecological footprints in BRI regions?
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the strategic role of stringent environmental policies and innovative technologies in China's green energy transitions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- How Do R&D and Renewable Energy Consumption Lead to Carbon Neutrality? Evidence from G-7 Economies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- How Can China and the Belt and Road Initiative Countries Work Together Responding to Climate Change: A Perspective on Carbon Emissions and Economic Spillover Effects.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- The nexus of financial development, technological innovation, institutional quality, and environmental quality: evidence from OECD economies.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- Does financial development reinforce ecological footprint in Singapore? Evidence from ARDL and Bayesian analysis.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- The nexus between environmental regulations, economic growth, and environmental sustainability: linking environmental patents to ecological footprint reduction in South Asia.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Exploring the role of finance, natural resources, and governance on the environment and economic growth in South Asian countries.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Heterogeneous effects of remittances and institutional quality in reducing environmental deficit in the presence of EKC hypothesis: A global study with the application of panel quantile regression.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Does foreign direct investments impair the ecological footprint? New evidence from the panel quantile regression.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Influence of tourism, governance, and foreign direct investment on energy consumption and COEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Revealing empirical association among ecological footprints, renewable energy consumption, real income, and financial development: a global perspective.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020Article
- The empirical relationship between environmental degradation, economic growth, and social well-being in Belt and Road Initiative countries.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020Article
- The impact of CEO tenure on corporate social and environmental performance: an emerging country's analysis.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020Article
- Urbanization and energy consumption effects on carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from Asian-8 countries using panel data analysis.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020Article
- Exploring the impact of innovation, renewable energy consumption, and income on CO2 emissions: new evidence from the BRICS economies.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study applies augmented mean group (AMG) along with common correlated effect mean group (CCEMG) estimator and panel heterogeneous causality to examine the interrelationship between GDP, energy consumption, financial development, foreign investment, and ecological footprints for five Belt and Road initiative (BRI) regions and in aggregated panel of BRI over the time 1990-2016. Using a multivariate framework, this study examines four alternative and conceivable hypotheses, including Pollution haven hypothesis, environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis, energy push emission hypothesis, and finance push emission hypothesis. The empirical results supported all four hypotheses for the panel of BRI and partially supported the existence of these hypotheses across the regions. Moreover, a variety of causal nexuses has been discussed in the study. Based on these results, the current research has proposed policy implications to combat the ecological footprints of BRI countries and across the regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31745792What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.