SynthesisThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2020
Assessment of the healing process after percutaneous implantation of a cardiovascular device: a systematic review.
Synthesis in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of endothelialization of an occluder device with cardiac computed tomography and assessment of the pathological validation.PloS one · 2025Article
- Assessment of Nit-Occlud atrial septal defect occluder device healing process using micro-computed tomography imaging.PloS one · 2023Article
- Lead-Related Venous Obstruction in Patients With Implanted Cardiac Devices: JACC Review Topic of the Week.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The healing process, occurring after intra-cardiac and intra-vascular device implantation, starts with fibrin condensation and attraction of inflammatory cells, followed by the formation of fibrous tissue that slowly covers the device. The duration of this process is variable and may be incomplete, which can lead to thrombus formation, dislodgement of the device or stenosis. To better understand this process and the neotissue formation, animal models were developed: small (rats and rabbits) and large (sheep, pigs, dogs and baboons) animal models for intra-vascular device implantation; sheep and pigs for intra-cardiac device implantation. After intra-vascular and intra-cardiac device implantation in these animal models, in vitro techniques, i.e. histology, which is the gold standard and scanning electron microscopy, were used to assess the device coverage, characterize the cell constitution and detect complications such as thrombosis. In humans, optical coherence tomography and intra-vascular ultrasounds are both invasive modalities used after stent implantation to assess the structure of the vessels, atheroma plaque and complications. Non-invasive techniques (computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) are in development in humans and animal models for tissue characterization (fibrosis), device remodeling evaluation and device implantation complications (thrombosis and stenosis). This review aims to (1) present the experimental models used to study this process on cardiac devices; (2) focus on the in vitro techniques and invasive modalities used currently in humans for intra-vascular and intra-cardiac devices and (3) assess the future developments of non-invasive techniques in animal models and humans for intra-cardiac devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.