Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31745743›Full record

SynthesisThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2020

Assessment of the healing process after percutaneous implantation of a cardiovascular device: a systematic review.

Elodie Perdreau, Zakaria Jalal, Richard D Walton, Jérôme Naulin, Julie Magat, Bruno Quesson, Hubert Cochet, Olivier Bernus, Jean-Benoît Thambo

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Elodie PerdreauIHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Fondation Bordeaux Université, 33600, Pessac- Bordeaux, France. elodie.perdreau@chu-lyon.fr.
Zakaria JalalIHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Fondation Bordeaux Université, 33600, Pessac- Bordeaux, France.
Richard D WaltonIHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Fondation Bordeaux Université, 33600, Pessac- Bordeaux, France.
Jérôme NaulinIHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Fondation Bordeaux Université, 33600, Pessac- Bordeaux, France.
Julie MagatIHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Fondation Bordeaux Université, 33600, Pessac- Bordeaux, France.
Bruno QuessonIHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Fondation Bordeaux Université, 33600, Pessac- Bordeaux, France.
Hubert CochetIHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Fondation Bordeaux Université, 33600, Pessac- Bordeaux, France.
Olivier BernusIHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Fondation Bordeaux Université, 33600, Pessac- Bordeaux, France.
Jean-Benoît ThamboIHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Fondation Bordeaux Université, 33600, Pessac- Bordeaux, France.
Inserm · FRUniversité de Bordeaux · FRElectrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute · FRCentre de Recherche Cardio-Thoracique de Bordeaux · FR

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-10-IAHU-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The healing process, occurring after intra-cardiac and intra-vascular device implantation, starts with fibrin condensation and attraction of inflammatory cells, followed by the formation of fibrous tissue that slowly covers the device. The duration of this process is variable and may be incomplete, which can lead to thrombus formation, dislodgement of the device or stenosis. To better understand this process and the neotissue formation, animal models were developed: small (rats and rabbits) and large (sheep, pigs, dogs and baboons) animal models for intra-vascular device implantation; sheep and pigs for intra-cardiac device implantation. After intra-vascular and intra-cardiac device implantation in these animal models, in vitro techniques, i.e. histology, which is the gold standard and scanning electron microscopy, were used to assess the device coverage, characterize the cell constitution and detect complications such as thrombosis. In humans, optical coherence tomography and intra-vascular ultrasounds are both invasive modalities used after stent implantation to assess the structure of the vessels, atheroma plaque and complications. Non-invasive techniques (computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) are in development in humans and animal models for tissue characterization (fibrosis), device remodeling evaluation and device implantation complications (thrombosis and stenosis). This review aims to (1) present the experimental models used to study this process on cardiac devices; (2) focus on the in vitro techniques and invasive modalities used currently in humans for intra-vascular and intra-cardiac devices and (3) assess the future developments of non-invasive techniques in animal models and humans for intra-cardiac devices.

Indexed as

Defibrillators, ImplantablePacemaker, ArtificialStentsWound HealingAnimalsBiopsyBlood VesselsEndovascular ProceduresFibrosisHumansModels, AnimalMyocardiumPercutaneous Coronary InterventionProsthesis ImplantationRisk FactorsTime FactorsAnimal modelsCardiac deviceHealing processHistologyImaging techniquesThrombosis

Identifiers

PMID31745743
OpenAlexW2990789093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.