ArticleDysphagia2020
Presbyphagia Diagnostics Using M-Mode Ultrasound: Changes in the Tongue Movement Pattern.
Article in Dysphagia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Presbyphagia: A Conceptual Analysis of Contemporary Proposals and Their Influences on Clinical Diagnosis.Dysphagia · 2024Pooled it
- Article
- Methodological Procedures to Acquire and Analyze Ultrasound Images of Swallowing: A Scoping Review.Dysphagia · 2025Article
- Assessing the oral and suprahyoid muscles in healthy adults using muscle ultrasound to inform the swallowing process: a proof-of-concept study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Sarcopenic Dysphagia and Simplified Rehabilitation Nutrition Care Process: An Update.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2023Article
- Ultrasonography for Eating and Swallowing Assessment: A Narrative Review of Integrated Insights for Noninvasive Clinical Practice.Nutrients · 2023Review
- Evaluation of Esophageal Dysphagia in Elderly Patients.Current gastroenterology reports · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Age-related physiological changes of the swallowing act impair particularly the oral phase and the tongue function, which is very important for bolus preparation and transfer. At present, there are no easily applicable methods for measurement of this phase of swallowing. This study was designed to investigate the deglutitive tongue movement by M-mode ultrasound and to compare the collected parameters of different age groups. In this exploratory prospective study, the tongue and its movements of 20 younger and 30 older women were examined during swallowing by B-mode and M-mode ultrasound. Preexisting dysphagia or malnutrition as well as psychic or neurological deficits were excluded by clinical examination and screening with the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF), the Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS), the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Barthel Index. The data were compared with each other and statistically analyzed. With increasing age, a change in the tongue movement pattern becomes apparent. In the group of older women, the vertical lingual movement had a smaller amplitude (p < 0.001) and a shorter time to the maximum amplitude (p < 0.03) than in the group of younger women. However, there were no differences in the tongue diameter (p > 0.4). The tongue movement pattern appears to be subject to age-specific changes, in contrast to anatomy. The use of M-mode ultrasonography is an easy, radiation-free and cost-effective method for the assessment of the oral phase of swallowing. Limitations are the widely scattered values of the ultrasound findings. Further studies are needed for validation and definition of standard values for this promising method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31745715What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.