Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31745671›Full record

ArticleFunctional & integrative genomics2020

Dynamic response of RNA editing to temperature in grape by RNA deep sequencing.

Aidi Zhang, Xiaohan Jiang, Fuping Zhang, Tengfei Wang, Xiujun Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Functional & integrative genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. RNA Editing in Chloroplast: Advancements and Opportunities.Current issues in molecular biology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aidi ZhangKey Laboratory of Plant Germplasm Enhancement and Specialty Agriculture, Wuhan Botanical Garden of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430072, China.
Xiaohan JiangKey Laboratory of Plant Germplasm Enhancement and Specialty Agriculture, Wuhan Botanical Garden of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430072, China.
Fuping ZhangKey Laboratory of Plant Germplasm Enhancement and Specialty Agriculture, Wuhan Botanical Garden of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430072, China.
Tengfei WangKey Laboratory of Plant Germplasm Enhancement and Specialty Agriculture, Wuhan Botanical Garden of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430072, China.
Xiujun ZhangKey Laboratory of Plant Germplasm Enhancement and Specialty Agriculture, Wuhan Botanical Garden of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430072, China. zhangxj@wbgcas.cn.

Funding

CAS Pioneer Hundred Talents Program and the National Project of Cause Control Theory No.1716315XJ00200303National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 31702322National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 61402457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA editing is a post-transcriptional process of modifying genetic information on RNA molecules, which provides cells an additional level of gene expression regulation. Unlike mammals, in land plants, RNA editing converts C-to-U residues in organelles. However, its potential roles in response to different stressors (heat, salt, and so on) remains unclear. Grape is one of the most popular and economically important fruits in the world, and its production, like other crops, must deal with abiotic and biotic stresses, which cause reductions in yield and fruit quality. In our study, we tested the influence of the environmental factor temperature on RNA editing process in the whole mRNA from grape organelle. In total, we identified 122 and 627 RNA editing sites in chloroplast and mitochondria respectively with the average editing efficiency nearly ~ 60%. The analyses revealed that number of non-synonymous editing sites were higher than that of synonymous editing sites, and the amino acid substitution type tends to be hydrophobic. Additionally, the overall editing level decreased with the temperature rises, especially for several gene transcripts in chloroplast and mitochondria (matK, ndhB, etc.). We also found that the expression level of most PPR genes decreased with the temperature rises, which may contribute to the decline of RNA editing efficiency at high temperature. Our findings suggested that the RNA editing events were very sensitive to heat stress; the changes of amino acid in RNA editing genes may contribute to the stress adaption for grape.

Indexed as

RNA EditingThermotoleranceChloroplastsGene Expression Regulation, PlantMitochondriaVitisgrapePPRRNA editingRNA sequencingStressTemperature

Identifiers

PMID31745671
PMCPMC7152585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.