Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31745634›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2020

Inter-laboratory study on standardized MPS libraries: evaluation of performance, concordance, and sensitivity using mixtures and degraded DNA.

Petra Müller, Christian Sell, Thorsten Hadrys, Johannes Hedman, Steffi Bredemeyer, Francois-Xavier Laurent, Lutz Roewer, Sabrina Achtruth, Maja Sidstedt, Titia Sijen and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Petra MüllerInstitute of Legal Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Müllerstraße 44, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Christian SellFederal Criminal Police Office, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Thorsten HadrysInstitute of Forensic Sciences, DNA Department, Bavarian State Criminal Police Office, Munich, Germany.
Johannes HedmanSwedish National Forensic Centre (NFC), Linköping, Sweden.
Steffi BredemeyerInstitute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Francois-Xavier LaurentInstitut National de Police Scientifique, Laboratoire de Police Scientifique de Lyon, Ecully Cedex, France.
Lutz RoewerInstitute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sabrina AchtruthThe Police President in Berlin, Forensic Science Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Maja SidstedtSwedish National Forensic Centre (NFC), Linköping, Sweden.
Titia SijenBiological Traces, Netherlands Forensic Institute, Laan van Ypenburg 6, 2497 GB, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Marc TrimbornThe Police President in Berlin, Forensic Science Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Natalie WeilerBiological Traces, Netherlands Forensic Institute, Laan van Ypenburg 6, 2497 GB, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Sascha WilluweitInstitute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ingo BastischFederal Criminal Police Office, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Walther ParsonInstitute of Legal Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Müllerstraße 44, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. walther.parson@i-med.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5692-2392
SeqForSTR-Consortium
Bundeskriminalamt · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DELund University · SENetherlands Forensic Institute · NLInnsbruck Medical University · ATInstitut National de Police Scientifique · FRPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Horizon 2020 HOME/2014/ISFP/AG/LAWX/4000007135Horizon 2020 Framework Programme IZ25-5793-2015-30 2017-2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present results from an inter-laboratory massively parallel sequencing (MPS) study in the framework of the SeqForSTRs project to evaluate forensically relevant parameters, such as performance, concordance, and sensitivity, using a standardized sequencing library including reference material, mixtures, and ancient DNA samples. The standardized library was prepared using the ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit (primer mix A). The library was shared between eight European laboratories located in Austria, France, Germany, The Netherlands, and Sweden to perform MPS on their particular MiSeq FGx sequencers. Despite variation in performance between sequencing runs, all laboratories obtained quality metrics that fell within the manufacturer's recommended ranges. Furthermore, differences in locus coverage did not inevitably adversely affect heterozygous balance. Inter-laboratory concordance showed 100% concordant genotypes for the included autosomal and Y-STRs, and still, X-STR concordance exceeded 83%. The exclusive reasons for X-STR discordances were drop-outs at DXS10103. Sensitivity experiments demonstrated that correct allele calling varied between sequencing instruments in particular for lower DNA amounts (≤ 125 pg). The analysis of compromised DNA samples showed the drop-out of one sample (FA10013B01A) while for the remaining three degraded DNA samples MPS was able to successfully type ≥ 87% of all aSTRs, ≥ 78% of all Y-STRs, ≥ 68% of all X-STRs, and ≥ 92% of all iSNPs demonstrating that MPS is a promising tool for human identity testing, which in return, has to undergo rigorous in-house validation before it can be implemented into forensic routine casework.

Indexed as

Gene LibraryHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMicrosatellite RepeatsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNAAllelesAustriaDNA FingerprintingElectrophoresis, CapillaryFemaleFranceGermanyHumansLaboratoriesMaleNetherlandsCollaborative studyForenSeq DNA Signature Prep KitInter-laboratory studyMassively parallel sequencingShort tandem repeats

Identifiers

PMID31745634
PMCPMC6949318
OpenAlexW2990656456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.