ArticleImmunogenetics2019
Evaluation of alloreactive T cells based on the degree of MHC incompatibility using flow cytometric mixed lymphocyte reaction assay in dogs.
Article in Immunogenetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mixed Lymphocyte Reaction: Functional Immune Profiling in Transplantation and Beyond.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Zebrafish Xenograft Model for Predicting Cisplatin Efficacy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.Cancer science · 2025Article
- Article
- Dog leukocyte antigen class II alleles and haplotypes associated with meningoencephalomyelitis of unknown origin in Chihuahuas.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2023Article
- Passive transfer of colostral leukocytes: A benefit/risk analysis.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2021Review
- Capacity of Retinal Ganglion Cells Derived from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells to Suppress T-Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- The utility of DLA typing for transplantation medicine in canine models.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It has become anticipated that regenerative medicine will extend into the field of veterinary medicine as new treatments for various disorders. Although the use of allogeneic stem cells for tissue regeneration is more attractive than that of autologous cells in emergencies, the therapeutic potential of allogeneic transplantation is often limited by allo-immune responses inducing graft rejection. Therefore, a methodology for quantifying and monitoring alloreactive T cells is necessary for evaluating allo-immune responses. The mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) is widely used to evaluate T cell alloreactivity. In human, flow cytometric MLR with carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester has been established and used as a more useful assay than conventional MLR with radioisotope labeling. However, the available information about alloreactivity based on the differences of dog major histocompatibility complex (MHC) (dog leukocyte antigen, DLA) is quite limited in dog. In this paper, we describe our established flow cytometric MLR method that can quantify the T cell alloreactivity while distinguishing cell phenotypes in dog, and T cell alloreactivity among DLA-type matched pairs was significantly lower than DLA-mismatched pairs, suggesting that our developed flow cytometric MLR method is useful for quantifying T cell alloreactivity. In addition, we demonstrated the advantage of DLA homozygous cells as a donor (stimulator) for allogeneic transplantation. We also elucidated that the frequency of alloreactive T cell precursors was almost the same as that of mouse and human (1-10%). To our knowledge, this is the first report to focus on the degree of allo-immune responses in dog based on the differences of DLA polymorphisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.