Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31745554›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2020

Atypical organizations and epistatic interactions of CRISPRs and cas clusters in genomes and their mobile genetic elements.

Aude Bernheim, David Bikard, Marie Touchon, Eduardo P C Rocha

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. CRISPR adaptation inmSphere · 2025
    Article
  8. The extended mobility of plasmids.Nucleic acids research · 2025
    Review
  9. A phylogenetic approach to comparative genomics.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Targeted phage hunting to specificMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Microbiome research reports · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aude BernheimMicrobial Evolutionary Genomics, Institut Pasteur, CNRS, UMR3525, 25-28 rue Dr. Roux, Paris 75015, France.
David BikardSynthetic Biology Group, Institut Pasteur, 25-28 rue Dr. Roux, Paris 75015, France.
Marie TouchonMicrobial Evolutionary Genomics, Institut Pasteur, CNRS, UMR3525, 25-28 rue Dr. Roux, Paris 75015, France.
Eduardo P C RochaMicrobial Evolutionary Genomics, Institut Pasteur, CNRS, UMR3525, 25-28 rue Dr. Roux, Paris 75015, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut Pasteur · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prokaryotes use CRISPR-Cas systems for adaptive immunity, but the reasons for the frequent existence of multiple CRISPRs and cas clusters remain poorly understood. Here, we analysed the joint distribution of CRISPR and cas genes in a large set of fully sequenced bacterial genomes and their mobile genetic elements. Our analysis suggests few negative and many positive epistatic interactions between Cas subtypes. The latter often result in complex genetic organizations, where a locus has a single adaptation module and diverse interference mechanisms that might provide more effective immunity. We typed CRISPRs that could not be unambiguously associated with a cas cluster and found that such complex loci tend to have unique type I repeats in multiple CRISPRs. Many chromosomal CRISPRs lack a neighboring Cas system and they often have repeats compatible with the Cas systems encoded in trans. Phages and 25 000 prophages were almost devoid of CRISPR-Cas systems, whereas 3% of plasmids had CRISPR-Cas systems or isolated CRISPRs. The latter were often compatible with the chromosomal cas clusters, suggesting that plasmids can co-opt the latter. These results highlight the importance of interactions between CRISPRs and cas present in multiple copies and in distinct genomic locations in the function and evolution of bacterial immunity.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityBacteriophagesCRISPR-Cas SystemsGenome, BacterialGenomicsInterspersed Repetitive SequencesPlasmidsProkaryotic CellsProphages

Identifiers

PMID31745554
PMCPMC7145637
OpenAlexW2989586324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.