ArticleAesthetic surgery journal2020
Supero-Septum Pedicle Mammaplasty: A New Modification for Reduction Mammaplasty.
Article in Aesthetic surgery journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Response to: The Fallacy of the Internal Bra.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
- Comment on: Internal Bra: A literature Review and Sub-classification of Definitions.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
- A Review of Mammaplasties With Measurements: Evaluating Autoaugmentation, Mesh, Acellular Dermal Matrix, and the Wise Pattern.Annals of plastic surgery · 2025Review
- Three-Pedicle Reduction Mammaplasty Technique in the Treatment of Greater Breast Hypertrophy Patients With or Without Breast Cancer: Surgical and Patient-reported outcomes.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2023Article
- Response to "The Supero-Septum Pedicle Mammaplasty: How Does It Perform?"Aesthetic surgery journal · 2021Article
- A Review and Measurement Study of the Central Mound Pedicle for Breast Reduction.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany techniques have been introduced for reduction mammaplasty and are utilized in diverse frequencies by different surgeons according to patient needs. Each technique is evaluated based on the aesthetic result, longevity, complication rate, and preservation of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) sensation.
objectivesThe authors sought to introduce the new modified technique of supero-septum pedicle mammaplasty (SSPM) that utilizes both the septum and superior pedicle and is suitable for macromastia and gigantomastia cases.
methodsBetween 2015 and 2018, 60 women who underwent SSPM were evaluated in a prospective study after undergoing superior pedicle deepithelialization and resection of the inferior, lateral, and medial segments. In the lateral pillar, a tongue of tissue was preserved for fixation to the medial pectoral fascia through a window created in the superior pedicle at the third intercostal space. Finally, septum pedicle was sutured to the fascia and muscle at the upper border of the sixth rib somewhat medially. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 13 months.
resultsThe mean nipple-to-sternal notch (N-SN) distance was 33.05 cm, and the mean NAC elevation was 10.92 cm. Breast reductions varied from 270 to 2800 g per breast. Complications included wound dehiscence (5%), wound infection (2.5%), and partial NAC necrosis (2.5%). At 6 months postoperation, the NAC sensation was significantly better compared with preoperative values (P < 0.005).
conclusionsSSPM is a relatively safe method of reduction mammaplasty, even for very large breasts, that leads to good aesthetic form along with preserving circulation and sensation of the NAC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.