ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Quality Improvement Interventions to Improve Critical Congenital Heart Disease Screening.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neonatal nurses' performance in implementing the advancing newborn screening of critical congenital heart disease.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- CCHD Screening Implementation Efforts in Latin American Countries by the Ibero American Society of Neonatology (SIBEN).International journal of neonatal screening · 2020Review
- Strategies to Improve Compliance with Clinical Nursing Documentation Guidelines in the Acute Hospital Setting: A Systematic Review and Analysis.SAGE open nursingReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Newborn screening for critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) using pulse oximetry improves detection and is associated with decreased related infant mortality. In 2015, the Healthy Hearts of Babies Act required hospitals to screen all newborns in the District of Columbia for CCHD using pulse oximetry and to provide documentation of individual screening results to the Department of Health. A regulatory report from the electronic health record revealed an opportunity to improve both documentation and protocol adherence within our hospital. We aimed to reduce documentation errors and protocol violations by 75% and sustain this improvement for 6 months.
methodsIn February of 2014, our center, a large free-standing children's hospital, implemented CCHD screening in the neonatal intensive care unit on all infants without known congenital heart disease or receiving supplemental oxygen. During the intervention period (January 2016 to December 2018), an interdisciplinary team engaged in regular review and analysis of reports, monthly closed-loop feedback, and iterative refinements to the electronic health record. Statistical process control charts were used to compare a baseline period to the intervention period and track monthly progress.
resultsBetween February 2014 and December 2018, we screened 2,214 infants for CCHD. The average percentage of documentation errors decreased from 23.5% during the baseline period to 1.2% during the intervention period, a sustained reduction for over 2 years. Protocol violations occurred at an average of 2.1% in the baseline period, with a sustained decrease to 0.6% during the intervention period.
conclusionsThis multimodal quality improvement project demonstrated a sustained reduction of CCHD screening documentation errors and protocol violations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.