Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31745520›Full record

ArticlePediatric quality & safety

Increasing Recognition and Diagnosis of Adolescent Depression: Project RedDE: A Cluster Randomized Trial.

Michael L Rinke, David G Bundy, Ruth E K Stein, Heather C O'Donnell, Moonseong Heo, Shilpa Sangvai, Harris Lilienfeld, Hardeep Singh

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael L RinkeDepartment of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital at Montefiore and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, N.Y.
David G BundyDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, S.C.
Ruth E K SteinDepartment of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital at Montefiore and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, N.Y.
Heather C O'DonnellChildren's Hospital Boston, Boston, Mass.
Moonseong HeoDepartment of Public Health Sciences, and School of Mathematical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, S.C.
Shilpa SangvaiDepartment of Pediatrics, Dayton Children's Hospital, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio.
Harris LilienfeldDelaware Valley Pediatric Associates, Lawrence, N.J.
Hardeep SinghCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex.
GTx (United States) · USChildren's Hospital · TNWright State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescent depression causes appreciable morbidity and is underdiagnosed in primary care. This study investigated whether a quality improvement collaborative (QIC) increases the frequency of adolescent depression diagnoses, thus reducing missed diagnoses.

methodsDuring a cluster-randomized clinical trial, a national cohort of primary care pediatric practices worked in different orders based on randomization to improve performance on each of three different diagnoses; one was increasing adolescent depression diagnoses. While improving their first diagnosis during an 8-month action period, practices collected control data for a different diagnosis. In two subsequent 8-month periods, practices worked to improve two additional diagnoses and continued to provide data on the ability to sustain and maintain improvements. The QIC intervention included day-long video conferences, transparent data sharing, analysis of failures, QI coaching, and tools to help improve diagnostic performance, including the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Modified. The primary outcome was the measured frequency of depression diagnoses in adolescent health supervision visits compared via generalized mixed-effects regression models.

resultsForty-three practices were randomized with 31 in the final analysis. We included 3,394 patient visits in the control and 4,114 in the intervention phases. The adjusted percentage of patients with depression diagnoses increased from 6.6% in the control to 10.5% in intervention phase (Risk Difference (RD) 3.9%; 95% CI 2.4%, 5.3%). Practices sustained these increases while working on different diagnoses during the second (RD -0.4%; 95% CI -2.3, 1.4%), and third action periods (RD -0.1%; 95% CI -2.7%, 2.4%).

conclusionsA QIC intervention can sustainably increase adolescent depression diagnoses.

Identifiers

PMID31745520
PMCPMC6805099
OpenAlexW2978967144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.