Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31745373›Full record

ArticleJournal of mathematical psychology2017

Approaches to Analysis in Model-based Cognitive Neuroscience.

Brandon M Turner, Birte U Forstmann, Bradley C Love, Thomas J Palmeri, Leendert Van Maanen

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mathematical psychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03526991 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Exploring the Effects of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease.

TypeinterventionalSponsorNora VanegasRan2021 to 2026Enrolled10ConditionsParkinson DiseaseArmsSpinal Cord Stimulator (SCS)
NCT06272955 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Long term effects of spinal cord stimulation in patients with parkinson's disease open label extension to h-49023

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorNora VanegasRan2024 to 2025Enrolled10ConditionsParkinson DiseaseArmsSpinal Cord Stimulator (SCS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Joint models reveal human subcortical underpinnings of choice and learning behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brandon M TurnerDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University.
Birte U ForstmannDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam.
Bradley C LoveDepartment of Psychology, University College, London.
Thomas J PalmeriDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University.
Leendert Van MaanenDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam.

Funding

Shop Module CoreP30EY008126 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI David J. Calkins · 1989 to 2026
$19.6M
Stochastic Models of Visual SearchR01EY021833 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LOGAN, GORDON DENNIS, PALMERI, THOMAS · 2011 to 2023
$3.3M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY008126NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our understanding of cognition has been advanced by two traditionally nonoverlapping and non-interacting groups. Mathematical psychologists rely on behavioral data to evaluate formal models of cognition, whereas cognitive neuroscientists rely on statistical models to understand patterns of neural activity, often without any attempt to make a connection to the mechanism supporting the computation. Both approaches suffer from critical limitations as a direct result of their focus on data at one level of analysis (cf. Marr, 1982), and these limitations have inspired researchers to attempt to combine both neural and behavioral measures in a cross-level integrative fashion. The importance of solving this problem has spawned several entirely new theoretical and statistical frameworks developed by both mathematical psychologists and cognitive neuroscientists. However, with each new approach comes a particular set of limitations and benefits. In this article, we survey and characterize several approaches for linking brain and behavioral data. We organize these approaches on the basis of particular cognitive modeling goals: (1) using the neural data to constrain a behavioral model, (2) using the behavioral model to predict neural data, and (3) fitting both neural and behavioral data simultaneously. Within each goal, we highlight a few particularly successful approaches for accomplishing that goal, and discuss some applications. Finally, we provide a conceptual guide to choosing among various analytic approaches in performing model-based cognitive neuroscience.

Indexed as

analysis methodslinkingmodel-based cognitive neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID31745373
PMCPMC6863443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.