Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31745331›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2020

The global preclinical antibacterial pipeline.

Ursula Theuretzbacher, Kevin Outterson, Aleks Engel, Anders Karlén

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 339 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
339citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

339 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Bactericidal Activity of Eugenol-RichPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. [Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with multidrug-resistant bacterial infections combined with severe liver disease].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Multidrug-ResistantPolish journal of microbiology · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

279 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ursula TheuretzbacherCenter for Anti-Infective Agents, Vienna, Austria. utheuretzbacher@cefaia.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2116-7128
Kevin OuttersonBoston University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2513-3216
Aleks EngelNovo Holding A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5288-6179
Anders KarlénDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9512-6981

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibacterial resistance is a great concern and requires global action. A critical question is whether enough new antibacterial drugs are being discovered and developed. A review of the clinical antibacterial drug pipeline was recently published, but comprehensive information about the global preclinical pipeline is unavailable. This Review focuses on discovery and preclinical development projects and has found, as of 1 May 2019, 407 antibacterial projects from 314 institutions. The focus is on Gram-negative pathogens, particularly bacteria on the WHO priority bacteria list. The preclinical pipeline is characterized by high levels of diversity and interesting scientific concepts, with 135 projects on direct-acting small molecules that represent new classes, new targets or new mechanisms of action. There is also a strong trend towards non-traditional approaches, including diverse antivirulence approaches, microbiome-modifying strategies, and engineered phages and probiotics. The high number of pathogen-specific and adjunctive approaches is unprecedented in antibiotic history. Translational hurdles are not adequately addressed yet, especially development pathways to show clinical impact of non-traditional approaches. The innovative potential of the preclinical pipeline compared with the clinical pipeline is encouraging but fragile. Much more work, focus and funding are needed for the novel approaches to result in effective antibacterial therapies to sustainably combat antibacterial resistance.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsBiological TherapyDrug DiscoveryDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrug Resistance, BacterialTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID31745331
PMCPMC7223541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.