Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31745173›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

A comprehensive evaluation of pathogenic mutations in primary cutaneous melanomas, including the identification of novel loss-of-function variants.

Ivana Ticha, Jan Hojny, Romana Michalkova, Ondrej Kodet, Eva Krkavcova, Nikola Hajkova, Kristyna Nemejcova, Michaela Bartu, Radek Jaksa, Miroslav Dura and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Melanoma genomics - will we go beyond BRAF in clinics?Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review: The Key Factors to Melanomagenesis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ivana TichaInstitute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. ivana.ticha@vfn.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8451-4222
Jan HojnyInstitute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Romana MichalkovaInstitute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Ondrej KodetDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Eva KrkavcovaInstitute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Nikola HajkovaInstitute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Kristyna NemejcovaInstitute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Michaela BartuInstitute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Radek JaksaInstitute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Miroslav DuraInstitute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Madiha KanwalCancer Cell Biology, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Andra S MartinikovaCancer Cell Biology, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Libor MacurekCancer Cell Biology, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0987-1238
Petra ZemankovaInstitute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Zdenek KleiblInstitute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2050-9667
Pavel DundrInstitute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Charles University · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Molecular Genetics · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most common histological subtypes of cutaneous melanoma include superficial spreading and nodular melanoma. However, the spectrum of somatic mutations developed in those lesions and all potential druggable targets have not yet been fully elucidated. We present the results of a sequence capture NGS analysis of 114 primary nodular and superficial spreading melanomas identifying driver mutations using biostatistical, immunohistochemical and/or functional approach. The spectrum and frequency of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were identified across 54 evaluated genes, including 59 novel mutations, and the newly identified TP53 loss-of-function mutations p.(L194P) and p.(R280K). Frequently mutated genes most commonly affected the MAPK pathway, followed by chromatin remodeling, and cell cycle regulation. Frequent aberrations were also detected in the genes coding for proteins involved in DNA repair and the regulation and modification of cellular tight junctions. Furthermore, relatively frequent mutations were described in KDR and MET, which represent potential clinically important targets. Those results suggest that with the development of new therapeutic possibilities, not only BRAF testing, but complex molecular testing of cutaneous melanoma may become an integral part of the decision process concerning the treatment of patients with melanoma.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCell CycleChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyCutaneous Malignant MelanomaDNA RepairFemaleGene FrequencyGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLoss of Function MutationMaleMAP Kinase Signaling SystemBiomarkers, TumorProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID31745173
PMCPMC6863855
OpenAlexW2990615648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.