Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31744553›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2019

Wearable technology in stroke rehabilitation: towards improved diagnosis and treatment of upper-limb motor impairment.

Pablo Maceira-Elvira, Traian Popa, Anne-Christine Schmid, Friedhelm C Hummel

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 107 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05274360 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Neuroscience-Based Aphasia Therapy Adapted to Remote, Mobile-Based Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitute for Bioengineering of CataloniaRan2021 to 2021Enrolled15ConditionsAphasia, Broca, Aphasia, Wernicke, Aphasia, Fluent, Aphasia, NonfluentArmsMobile evidence-based aphasia therapy, Conventional aphasia rehabilitation
NCT05416619 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Hand MOtor Rehabilitation Using a sEMG-biofeedback, After Stroke: a Longitudinal Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorIRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyRan2017 to 2019Enrolled20ConditionsStroke, Stroke, Ischemic, Stroke Hemorrhagic, HemiparesisArmsREMO®
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Quality of mobility measures among individuals with acquired brain injury: an umbrella review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pablo Maceira-ElviraDefitech Chair in Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), 9, Chemin des Mines, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland.
Traian PopaDefitech Chair in Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), 9, Chemin des Mines, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland.
Anne-Christine SchmidDefitech Chair in Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), 9, Chemin des Mines, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland.
Friedhelm C HummelDefitech Chair in Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), 9, Chemin des Mines, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland. friedhelm.hummel@epfl.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-4746-4633

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke is one of the main causes of long-term disability worldwide, placing a large burden on individuals and society. Rehabilitation after stroke consists of an iterative process involving assessments and specialized training, aspects often constrained by limited resources of healthcare centers. Wearable technology has the potential to objectively assess and monitor patients inside and outside clinical environments, enabling a more detailed evaluation of the impairment and allowing the individualization of rehabilitation therapies. The present review aims to provide an overview of wearable sensors used in stroke rehabilitation research, with a particular focus on the upper extremity. We summarize results obtained by current research using a variety of wearable sensors and use them to critically discuss challenges and opportunities in the ongoing effort towards reliable and accessible tools for stroke rehabilitation. Finally, suggestions concerning data acquisition and processing to guide future studies performed by clinicians and engineers alike are provided.

Indexed as

Upper ExtremityWearable Electronic DevicesHumansMovement DisordersStrokeStroke RehabilitationHome-basedMonitorMotor functionRehabilitationRemoteStrokeTelemedicineWearable technology

Identifiers

PMID31744553
PMCPMC6862815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.