Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31744523›Full record

ArticleTrials2019

Room4Birth - the effect of an adaptable birthing room on labour and birth outcomes for nulliparous women at term with spontaneous labour start: study protocol for a randomised controlled superiority trial in Sweden.

Marie Berg, Lisa Goldkuhl, Christina Nilsson, Helle Wijk, Hanna Gyllensten, Göran Lindahl, Kerstin Uvnäs Moberg, Cecily Begley

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03948815 naunknown statusnot on this map

Room 4 Birth - An Adaptable Birthing Room and the Effect on Labour and Birth: A Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorGöteborg UniversityRan2019 to 2023Enrolled1,268ConditionsChild BirthArmsinterventional birthing room
NCT05436015 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Nature in Hospital - Effectiveness of Virtual Nature-based Intervention During First Stage of Labour: A Feasibility Study and Pilot RCT

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OuluRan2022 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsAnxiety, Fear of Childbirth, Stress, PainArmsVirtual nature-based intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marie BergInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Box 457, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden. marie.berg@fhs.gu.se.
Lisa GoldkuhlInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Box 457, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Christina NilssonFaculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, SE-501 90, Borås, Sweden.
Helle WijkInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Box 457, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Hanna GyllenstenInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Box 457, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Göran LindahlCentre for Healthcare Architecture , CVA, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Kerstin Uvnäs MobergUniversity of Agriculture (SLU), Uppsala, Sweden.
Cecily BegleySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, 24 D'Olier St, Dublin 2, Ireland.

Funding

Vetenskapsrådet 2018-02406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn important prerequisite for optimal healthcare is a secure, safe and comfortable environment. There is little research on how the physical design of birthing rooms affects labour, birth, childbirth experiences and birthing costs. This protocol outlines the design of a randomised controlled superiority trial (RCT) measuring and comparing effects and experiences of two types of birthing rooms, conducted in one labour ward in Sweden. METHODS/

designFollowing ethics approval, a study design was developed and tested for feasibility in a pilot study, which led to some important improvements for conducting the study. The main RCT started January 2019 and includes nulliparous women presenting to the labour ward in active, spontaneous labour and who understand either Swedish, Arabic, Somali or English. Those who consent are randomised on a 1:1 ratio to receive care either in a regular room (control group) or in a newly built birthing room designed with a person-centred approach and physical aspects (such as light, silencer, media installation offering programmed nature scenes with sound, bathtub, birth support tools) that are changeable according to a woman's wishes (intervention group). The primary efficacy endpoint is a composite score of four outcomes: no use of oxytocin for augmentation of labour; spontaneous vaginal births (i.e. no vaginal instrumental birth or caesarean section); normal postpartum blood loss (i.e. bleeding < 1000 ml); and a positive overall childbirth experience (7-10 on a scale of 1-10). To detect a difference in the composite score of 8% between the groups we need 1274 study participants (power of 80% with significance level 0.05). Secondary outcomes include: the four variables in the primary outcome; other physical outcomes of labour and birth; women's self-reported experiences (the birthing room, childbirth, fear of childbirth, health-related quality of life); and measurement of costs in relation to the hospital stay for mother and neonate. Additionally, an ethnographic study with participant observations will be conducted in both types of birthing rooms. DISCUSSION: The findings aim to guide the design of birthing rooms that contribute to optimal quality of hospital-based maternity care.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03948815. Registered 13 May 2019-retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Delivery RoomsLabor, ObstetricParturitionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePilot ProjectsPregnancyResearch DesignBirth environmentBirthing roomLabourPerson-centred careRandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID31744523
PMCPMC6862754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.