Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31744463›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2019

Mortality and comorbidity after non-operatively managed, low-energy pelvic fracture in patients over age 70: a comparison with an age-matched femoral neck fracture cohort and general population.

Aleksi Reito, Mari Kuoppala, Hanna Pajulammi, Lasse Hokkinen, Kati Kyrölä, Juha Paloneva

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The phenotype of pelvic and acetabular fractures in adults aged 50 and older: a national database analysis in the Netherlands.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Emerging basic science concepts in geriatric fracture fixation and patient recovery.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Risk Factors for Readmission Following Elderly Low Energy Pelvis Fractures.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Sacral U-type Fractures in Patients Older Than 65 years.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Adverse outcomes following pelvic fracture: the critical role of frailty.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aleksi ReitoDepartment of Orthopaedics and traumatology, Central Finland Hospital, Keskussairaalantie 19, 40620, Jyväskylä, Finland. aleksi@reito.fi.ORCID 0000-0002-6903-6461
Mari KuoppalaSchool of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Hanna PajulammiDepartment of Orthopaedics and traumatology, Central Finland Hospital, Keskussairaalantie 19, 40620, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Lasse HokkinenDepartment of Radiology, Central Finland Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Kati KyröläDepartment of Orthopaedics and traumatology, Central Finland Hospital, Keskussairaalantie 19, 40620, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Juha PalonevaDepartment of Orthopaedics and traumatology, Central Finland Hospital, Keskussairaalantie 19, 40620, Jyväskylä, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch on mortality and comorbidity associated with pelvic fractures in older patients is scarce. We aimed to determine the short- and long-term mortality rates of older patients with a pelvic ring fracture compared with both an age-matched cohort of patients with a femoral neck fracture and a general population, and to investigate 30- and 60-day readmission rates after pelvic fracture.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study done in an emergency department of a level II/III trauma center. All patients aged over 70 years diagnosed with a pelvic or acetabular fracture between January 2010 and December 2016 in our ED were identified. Two reference populations were used: patients operated due to femoral neck fracture in our institution between 2007 and 2008 and a general population aged 70 years or more.

resultsTwo hundred nineteen patients were identified. 30- and 90-day mortality was 7.3 and 11.4%, respectively. Compared to the general population, a pelvic fracture was associated with an 8.5-fold (95% CI: 5.2-13.9) and 11.0-fold (95% CI: 5.4-22.3) 90-day mortality risk in females and males, respectively. We could not observe a difference in the risk of 90-day mortality between femoral neck fracture patients and patients with a pelvic fracture. Within 30 days, 28 (12.8%) pelvic fracture patients were readmitted for in-patient care in our hospital.

conclusionsThe mortality of older patients with pelvic ring fractures resembles that after hip fracture. Although older patients with a pelvic ring fracture rarely require operative treatment, the severity of the injury should not be considered as a class apart from hip fracture.

Indexed as

Population SurveillanceAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesComorbidityFemaleFemoral Neck FracturesHumansMaleMortalityPatient ReadmissionPelvic BonesRetrospective StudiesAcetabular fractureComorbidityHip fractureMortalityPelvic fractureReadmission

Identifiers

PMID31744463
PMCPMC6862845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.