Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31744432›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019

The inherited bacterial symbiont

Hong-Wei Shan, Jun-Bo Luan, Yin-Quan Liu, Angela E Douglas, Shu-Sheng Liu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The Susceptibility ofInsects · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Natural and Engineered Sex Ratio Distortion in Insects.Frontiers in ecology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hong-Wei ShanMinistry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Crop Pathogens and Insects, Institute of Insect Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jun-Bo LuanDepartment of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Yin-Quan LiuMinistry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Crop Pathogens and Insects, Institute of Insect Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Angela E DouglasDepartment of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Shu-Sheng LiuMinistry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Crop Pathogens and Insects, Institute of Insect Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Zhejiang University · CNCornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many intracellular symbioses, the microbial symbionts provide nutrients advantageous to the host. However, the function of

Indexed as

Sex RatioSymbiosisAnimalsEnterobacteriaceaeFemaleHemipteraMaleReproductionendosymbiontreproductive manipulationsex allocation

Identifiers

PMID31744432
PMCPMC6892053
OpenAlexW2990209947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.