Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31744331›Full record

ArticleCirculation2020

Research Needs and Priorities for Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report From a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Virtual Workshop.

Sana M Al-Khatib, Emelia J Benjamin, Alfred E Buxton, Hugh Calkins, Mina K Chung, Anne B Curtis, Patrice Desvigne-Nickens, Pierre Jais, Douglas L Packer, Jonathan P Piccini and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. May Measure Month 2022 in Italy: A Focus on Fixed-dose Combination, Therapeutic Adherence, and Medical Inertia in a Nationwide Survey.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. HumanFrontiers in physiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Atrial Fibrillation (Part 2) - Catheter Ablation.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.

Sana M Al-KhatibDivision of Cardiology and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (S.M.A., J.P.P.).
Emelia J BenjaminCardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, and Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, MA (E.J.B.).
Alfred E BuxtonDivision of Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA (A.E.B.).
Hugh CalkinsDivision of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (H.C.).
Mina K ChungDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, OH (M.K.C.).
Anne B CurtisDepartment of Medicine, University at Buffalo School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, NY (A.B.C.).
Patrice Desvigne-NickensDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (P.D.N., Y.R., L.S.C.).
Pierre JaisCardiology Hospital, University of Bordeaux, France (P.J.).
Douglas L PackerDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (D.L.P.).
Jonathan P PicciniDivision of Cardiology and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (S.M.A., J.P.P.).
Yves RosenbergDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (P.D.N., Y.R., L.S.C.).
Andrea M RussoDivision of Cardiology, Cooper University, Camden, NJ (A.M.R.).
Paul J WangDepartments of Medicine and Health Research and Policy, Stanford University, CA (P.J.W.).
Lawton S CooperDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (P.D.N., Y.R., L.S.C.).
Alan S GoDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland (A.S.G.).
Workshop Collaborators
National Heart Lung and Blood Institute · USDuke Medical Center · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USBoston University · USCleveland Clinic · USCooper University Hospital · USJohns Hopkins University · USKaiser Permanente · USMayo Clinic · USStanford University · USUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

IDENTIFICATION OF COMMON GENETIC VARIANTS FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AND PR INTERVALR01HL092577 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BENJAMIN, EMELIA J., ELLINOR, PATRICK THOMAS · 2009 to 2025
$20.6M
Functional Genomics of Atrial Fibrillation in Human AtriaR01HL111314 · NHLBI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI BARNARD, JOHN, CHUNG, MINA KAY · 2012 to 2019
$6.1M
AFGen Consortium: Atrial Fibrillation Genomics to Functional AnalysesR01HL128914 · NHLBI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI BENJAMIN, EMELIA J., ELLINOR, PATRICK THOMAS · 2015 to 2018
$3.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL092577NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL111314NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL128914
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Catheter ablation has brought major advances in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). As evidenced by multiple randomized trials, AF catheter ablation can reduce the risk of recurrent AF and improve quality of life. In some studies, AF ablation significantly reduced cardiovascular hospitalizations. Despite the existing data on AF catheter ablation, numerous knowledge gaps remain concerning this intervention. This report is based on a recent virtual workshop convened by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute to identify key research opportunities in AF ablation. We outline knowledge gaps related to emerging technologies, the relationship between cardiac structure and function and the success of AF ablation in patient subgroups in whom clinical benefit from ablation varies, and potential platforms to advance clinical research in this area. This report also considers the potential value and challenges of a sham ablation randomized trial. Prioritized research opportunities are identified and highlighted to empower relevant stakeholders to collaborate in designing and conducting effective, cost-efficient, and transformative research to optimize the use and outcomes of AF ablation.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationAtrial FibrillationEducationHumansNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U.S.)Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicUnited Statesatrial fibrillationcatheter ablation

Identifiers

PMID31744331
PMCPMC7043236
OpenAlexW2990714607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.