Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31744161›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Computer Vision and IoT-Based Sensors in Flood Monitoring and Mapping: A Systematic Review.

Bilal Arshad, Robert Ogie, Johan Barthelemy, Biswajeet Pradhan, Nicolas Verstaevel, Pascal Perez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Assessment of the adequacy of mobile applications for disaster reduction.Environment, development and sustainability · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Flash Flood Early Warning System in Colima, Mexico.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bilal ArshadSMART Infrastructure Facility, University of Wollongong, Wollongong 2522, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6078-0235
Robert OgieSMART Infrastructure Facility, University of Wollongong, Wollongong 2522, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6476-2309
Johan BarthelemySMART Infrastructure Facility, University of Wollongong, Wollongong 2522, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7800-5309
Biswajeet PradhanThe Centre for Advanced Modelling and Geospatial Information Systems (CAMGIS), Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney 2007, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9863-2054
Nicolas VerstaevelUMR 5505 CNRS-IRIT, Université Toulouse 1 Capitole, 31062 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7879-6681
Pascal PerezSMART Infrastructure Facility, University of Wollongong, Wollongong 2522, NSW, Australia.

Funding

Australian Government Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Cities and Regional Development through the Smart Cities and Suburbs program - Round two SCS69244
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Floods are amongst the most common and devastating of all natural hazards. The alarming number of flood-related deaths and financial losses suffered annually across the world call for improved response to flood risks. Interestingly, the last decade has presented great opportunities with a series of scholarly activities exploring how camera images and wireless sensor data from Internet-of-Things (IoT) networks can improve flood management. This paper presents a systematic review of the literature regarding IoT-based sensors and computer vision applications in flood monitoring and mapping. The paper contributes by highlighting the main computer vision techniques and IoT sensor approaches utilised in the literature for real-time flood monitoring, flood modelling, mapping and early warning systems including the estimation of water level. The paper further contributes by providing recommendations for future research. In particular, the study recommends ways in which computer vision and IoT sensor techniques can be harnessed to better monitor and manage coastal lagoons-an aspect that is under-explored in the literature.

Indexed as

coastalcomputer visiondisaster managementdronesenvironmental sensor network (ESN)floodIoTremote sensingUAVwireless sensor network

Identifiers

PMID31744161
PMCPMC6891459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.