Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31744151›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2019

A Review of Fish Vaccine Development Strategies: Conventional Methods and Modern Biotechnological Approaches.

Jie Ma, Timothy J Bruce, Evan M Jones, Kenneth D Cain

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 120 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Development of a new recombineering system forSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2027
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Bacteriophages AgainstViruses · 2026
    Review
  7. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals IgMZoological research · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. A Chemically InducedVaccines · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jie MaDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Sciences, College of Natural Resources, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2175-8211
Timothy J BruceDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Sciences, College of Natural Resources, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4690-6516
Evan M JonesDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Sciences, College of Natural Resources, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.
Kenneth D CainDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Sciences, College of Natural Resources, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fish immunization has been carried out for over 50 years and is generally accepted as an effective method for preventing a wide range of bacterial and viral diseases. Vaccination efforts contribute to environmental, social, and economic sustainability in global aquaculture. Most licensed fish vaccines have traditionally been inactivated microorganisms that were formulated with adjuvants and delivered through immersion or injection routes. Live vaccines are more efficacious, as they mimic natural pathogen infection and generate a strong antibody response, thus having a greater potential to be administered via oral or immersion routes. Modern vaccine technology has targeted specific pathogen components, and vaccines developed using such approaches may include subunit, or recombinant, DNA/RNA particle vaccines. These advanced technologies have been developed globally and appear to induce greater levels of immunity than traditional fish vaccines. Advanced technologies have shown great promise for the future of aquaculture vaccines and will provide health benefits and enhanced economic potential for producers. This review describes the use of conventional aquaculture vaccines and provides an overview of current molecular approaches and strategies that are promising for new aquaculture vaccine development.

Indexed as

alternative vaccineaquacultureconventional vaccinestechnologies

Identifiers

PMID31744151
PMCPMC6920890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.