ReviewPharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)2019
A Systematic Review of Models Used and Preferences for Continuing Education and Continuing Professional Development of Pharmacists.
Review in Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of educational interventions in improving antimicrobial dispensing by community pharmacists: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluating the impact of faculty performance appraisal systems on curriculum development and laboratory innovation in pharmaceutical education.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Investigating the knowledge, attitude, and practice of cranberry extract supplements among registered pharmacists in Jordan.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Long-acting reversible contraception and medication abortion: a national descriptive survey of Australian community pharmacist knowledge, attitudes and practices.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Professional growth in pharmacy: examining CPD awareness, motivators, and barriers among pharmacists.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2025Article
- Assessing the Impact of a Leadership Development Programme for Community Pharmacy Neighbourhood Leads in South East London.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Jordanian community pharmacists' perceptions and experiences with continuing professional development - A comprehensive analysis.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2024Article
- Insights into Pharmacists' Participation in Professional Certification Programs in Saudi Arabia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Perceived Needs, Barriers, and Challenges to Continuing Professional Development (CPD): A Qualitative Exploration among Hospital Pharmacists.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Evaluation of factors affecting pharmacists and pharmacy technicians' satisfaction towards practicing CE activities in Saudi Arabia.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024Article
- A qualitative exploration of how pharmacy professionals in primary care utilise planned protected development time.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2024Article
- Optimizing Care Delivery in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease in the United States: Proceedings of a Multidisciplinary Roundtable Discussion and Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Professional Development to Improve Responsible Beverage Service Training: Formative Research Results and Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- A SWOT Analysis of Pharmacy Students' Perspectives on e-Learning Based on a Narrative Review.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Scoping of pharmacists' health leadership training needs for effective antimicrobial stewardship in Africa.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2023Article
- Evaluation of clinical versus non-clinical continuing education in terms of preferences and value for oral healthcare workers.Medical education online · 2022Article
- Learning Theory-Driven Tips for Designing Effective Learning Solutions for the Continuous Education of Community Pharmacists to Enhance Patient-Centered Care-A Qualitative Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Feasibility of using simulated patients for onsite structured practice feedback in Jordanian community pharmacy settings.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022Article
- A review of the continuous professional development system for pharmacists.Human resources for health · 2022Review
- Continuing Pharmacy Education: Exploring the Status and Future Prospects in Nepal.Advances in medical education and practice · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Continuing Education (CE) or Continuing Professional Development (CPD) are used by pharmacists globally to maintain up-to-date knowledge and skills throughout their careers. The primary aim of this study was to identify the formats or models used by pharmacists for CE and CPD globally. The secondary aim was to identify preferences of pharmacists, in relation to the variety of formats or models used to fulfil mandatory requirements, in order to support future planning of lifelong learning events. A systematic review was performed using PubMed, Science Direct, and Web of Science covering a time period from 1995 until March 2018. Searches were conducted in English, with studies on undergraduate studies being excluded. Eighteen papers from an initial search of 4561 were included from 2004 to 2014. All studies focused on pharmacists. Three studies identified face-to-face learning as a preference, with six studies identifying a positive impact of interactive learning. All four identified studies focusing on online provision were linked to CE. One study highlighted the benefits of blended learning. Two studies identified concluded that no one size fits all. A clear structure of event was highlighted in three studies. Three studies highlighted the relevance of topics to practice, and two studies showed the need for opportunities to apply knowledge. Due to the variety of formats and no consistent model, no perfect model or activity has been identified. However, CPD showed increased practice outcomes versus CE. Although an increasing amount of technology is being utilized, face-to-face learning is still preferred. Interactive, multiple-format learning should be used where possible, to reflect preferences of different learners. There is a need for a structured approach to the planning and learning event itself to support CE and CPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.