Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31743971›Full record

ArticleAllergy, asthma & immunology research2020

Deep Neural Network-Based Concentration Model for Oak Pollen Allergy Warning in South Korea.

Yun Am Seo, Kyu Rang Kim, Changbum Cho, Jae Won Oh, Tae Hee Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Allergy, asthma & immunology research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pollen Allergy in a Changing Planetary Environment.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yun Am SeoAI Weather Forecast Research Team, National Institute of Meteorological Science, Seogwipo, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9283-4376
Kyu Rang KimApplied Meteorology Research Division, National Institute of Meteorological Science, Seogwipo, Korea. krk9@kma.go.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8872-6751
Changbum ChoApplied Meteorology Research Division, National Institute of Meteorological Science, Seogwipo, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1940-7487
Jae Won OhDepartment of Pediatrics, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2714-0065
Tae Hee KimUrban Forest Research Center, National Institute of Forest Science, Korea Forest Service, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1630-0027

Funding

Korea Meteorological Administration 1365003004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOak is the dominant tree species in Korea. Oak pollen has the highest sensitivity rate among all allergenic tree species in Korea. A deep neural network (DNN)-based estimation model was developed to determine the concentration of oak pollen and overcome the shortcomings of conventional regression models.

methodsThe DNN model proposed in this study utilized weather factors as the input and provided pollen concentrations as the output. Weather and pollen concentration data were used from 2007 to 2016 obtained from the Korea Meteorological Administration pollen observation network. Because it is difficult to prevent over-fitting and underestimation by using a DNN model alone, we developed a bootstrap aggregating-type ensemble model. Each of the 30 ensemble members was trained with random sampling at a fixed rate according to the pollen risk grade. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed model, we compared its performance with those of models of regression and support vector regression (SVR) under the same conditions, with respect to the prediction of pollen concentrations, risk levels, and season length.

resultsThe mean absolute percentage error in the estimated pollen concentrations was 11.18%, 10.37%, and 5.04% for the regression, SVR and DNN models, respectively. The start of the pollen season was estimated to be 20, 22, and 6 days earlier than that predicted by the regression, SVR and DNN models, respectively. Similarly, the end of the pollen season was estimated to be 33, 20, and 9 days later that predicted by the regression, SVR and DNN models, respectively.

conclusionsOverall, the DNN model performed better than the other models. However, the prediction of peak pollen concentrations needs improvement. Improved observation quality with optimization of the DNN model will resolve this issue.

Indexed as

allergic rhinitisdeep learningPollenpollen grainsquercusseasons

Identifiers

PMID31743971
PMCPMC6875477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.