Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31743836›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology2019

Panther Fusion® Respiratory Virus Assays for the detection of influenza and other respiratory viruses.

Kathleen A Stellrecht, Jesse L Cimino, Lisa I Wilson, Vincente P Maceira, Shafiq A Butt

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Combined SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification testing and respiratory virus panel RT-PCR on the Hologic Panther Fusion system.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kathleen A StellrechtDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, United States; Department of Immunology and Microbial Diseases, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, United States; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Albany Medical Center Hospital, Albany, New York, United States. Electronic address: stellrk@mail.amc.edu.
Jesse L CiminoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Albany Medical Center Hospital, Albany, New York, United States.
Lisa I WilsonDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Albany Medical Center Hospital, Albany, New York, United States.
Vincente P MaceiraDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Albany Medical Center Hospital, Albany, New York, United States.
Shafiq A ButtDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Albany Medical Center Hospital, Albany, New York, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs), such as PCR, are preferred for respiratory virus testing, due to superior diagnostic accuracy and faster turnaround time. Panther Fusion® Respiratory Assays (Fusion), which includes FluA/B/RSV (FFABR), Paraflu and AdV/hMPV/RV, offers a modular approach to syndromic testing on a fully automated platform while improving gene targets and expanding the test menu. OBJECTIVES AND STUDY

designWe evaluated Fusion using 275 consecutive nasopharyngeal specimens previously used in an analysis of five PCRs, as well as 225 archived specimens.

resultsOf the combined 500 specimens, 134 were positive for influenza A (FluA), 54 for FluB, 65 for RSV, 64 for parainfluenza (PIV), 24 for adenovirus (AdV), 21 for humanmetapneumovirus (hMPV), and 40 for rhinovirus (RV) with Fusion. Of the positive samples Fusion correlated with historical results for all but one, despite multiple freeze-thaws cycles of this collection. Fusion was positive for an additional 33 samples, including 11 FluAs, 7 RSVs, 3 PIV3s, 3 AdV, 6 hMPV and 3 RVs. These samples were retested with corresponding Prodesse (Pro) assays using quadruple sample volume. This resolver test confirmed Fusion results for an additional 4 FluAs, 4 RSVs, 1 PIV3 and 3 AdVs. The sensitivity and specificity ranges of Fusion were 99-100% and 98-100%. Limit of detection (LOD) analyses were performed on a variety of Flu isolates. The LODs ranged from 2.69 to 2.99 log copies/ml and demonstrated superior LOD as compared to previously published data for some assays or to concurrent analyses with two new commercial tests.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAutomation, LaboratoryChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLimit of DetectionMaleMiddle AgedNasopharynxNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesDiagnostic PCRInfluenzaRespiratory viruses

Identifiers

PMID31743836
PMCPMC7172166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.