ArticleNeuropsychologia2020
The core episodic simulation network dissociates as a function of subjective experience and objective content.
Article in Neuropsychologia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Initial evaluation of domain-specific episodic future thinking on delay discounting and cannabis use.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2022Trial
- What episodic memory reveals about the default mode network.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2026Article
- Constructive Memory and Conscious Experience.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2024Article
- The shared and unique neural correlates of personal semantic, general semantic, and episodic memory.eLife · 2023Article
- Development of the neural correlates of recollection.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Drinking to Cope is Uniquely Associated with Less Specific and Bleaker Future Goal Generation in Young Hazardous Drinkers.Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment · 2023Article
- Multidisciplinary Intersections on Artificial-Human Vividness: Phenomenology, Representation, and the Brain.Brain sciences · 2022Review
- Temporal pole volume is associated with episodic autobiographical memory in healthy older adults.Hippocampus · 2022Article
- Troubled past: A critical psychometric assessment of the self-report Survey of Autobiographical Memory (SAM).Behavior research methods · 2022Article
- Stimulation of distinct parietal locations differentiates frontal versus hippocampal network involvement in memory formation.Current research in neurobiology · 2022Article
- Subjective Time in Dementia: A Critical Review.Brain sciences · 2021Review
- Reinstatement of item-specific contextual details during retrieval supports recombination-related false memories.NeuroImage · 2021Article
- Divergent thinking and constructing future events: dissociating old from new ideas.Memory (Hove, England) · 2021Article
- The Ventral and Dorsal Default Mode Networks Are Dissociably Modulated by the Vividness and Valence of Imagined Events.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021Article
- Evidence supporting a time-limited hippocampal role in retrieving autobiographical memories.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Modulation of hippocampal brain networks produces changes in episodic simulation and divergent thinking.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Grandiose narcissism influences the phenomenology of remembered past and imagined future events.Memory (Hove, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Episodic simulation - the mental construction of a possible future event - has been consistently associated with enhanced activity in a set of neural regions referred to as the core network. In the current functional neuroimaging study, we assessed whether members of the core network are differentially associated with the subjective experience of future events (i.e., vividness) versus the objective content comprising those events (i.e., the amount of episodic details). During scanning, participants imagined future events in response to object cues. On each trial, participants rated the subjective vividness associated with each future event. Participants completed a post-scan interview where they viewed each object cue from the scanner and verbally reported whatever they had thought about. For imagined events, we quantified the number of episodic or internal details in accordance with the Autobiographical Interview (i.e., who, what, when, and where details of each central event). To test whether core network regions are differentially associated with subjective experience or objective episodic content, imagined future events were sorted as a function of their rated vividness or the amount of episodic detail. Univariate analyses revealed that some regions of the core network were uniquely sensitive to the vividness of imagined future events, including the hippocampus (i.e., high > low vividness), whereas other regions, such as the lateral parietal cortex, were sensitive to the amount of episodic detail in the event (i.e., high > low episodic details). The present results indicate that members of the core network support distinct episodic simulation-related processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.