Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31743527›Full record

ReviewGlia2020

Microglia and sexual differentiation of the developing brain: A focus on ontogeny and intrinsic factors.

Evan A Bordt, Alexis M Ceasrine, Staci D Bilbo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Glia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Microglia as critical mediators linking perinatal immune stress to mental health trajectories.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The psychedelic-peptide paradox: a hormetic hypothesis.Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Evan A BordtDepartment of Pediatrics, Lurie Center for Autism, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-0617-2789
Alexis M CeasrineDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Staci D BilboDepartment of Pediatrics, Lurie Center for Autism, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Environmental Toxins and Microglia-Synapse Interactions in AutismR01ES025549 · NIEHS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BILBO, STACI D, DZIRASA, KAFUI · 2016 to 2020
$2.1M
Sex Differences in Developing Microglia: Implications for Synaptic PruningR01MH101183 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BILBO, STACI D · 2013 to 2017
$2.0M
Neural-Glial Interactions and Opioid Abuse: Modulation by Early-Life ExperienceR01DA034185 · NIDA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BILBO, STACI D · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
Sex-Biased Mitochondrial Alterations Underlying Male Susceptibility to Neurodevelopmental DisordersF32MH116604 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BORDT, EVAN ANDREW · 2018 to 2021
$217k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA034185NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES025549NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH116604NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH101183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexual differentiation of the brain during early development likely underlies the strong sex biases prevalent in many neurological conditions. Mounting evidence indicates that microglia, the innate immune cells of the central nervous system, are intricately involved in these sex-specific processes of differentiation. In this review, we synthesize literature demonstrating sex differences in microglial number, morphology, transcriptional state, and functionality throughout spatiotemporal development as well as highlight current literature regarding ontogeny of microglia. Along with vanRyzin et al. in this issue, we explore the idea that differences in microglia imparted by chromosomal or ontogeny-related programming can influence microglial-driven sexual differentiation of the brain, as well as the idea that extrinsic differences in the male and female brain microenvironment may in turn impart sex differences in microglia.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAnimalsBrainHumansMaleMicrogliaNervous System DiseasesNeuronsSex Differentiation

Identifiers

PMID31743527
PMCPMC7148120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.