Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31743346›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Exploiting open source 3D printer architecture for laboratory robotics to automate high-throughput time-lapse imaging for analytical microbiology.

Sarah H Needs, Tai The Diep, Stephanie P Bull, Anton Lindley-Decaire, Partha Ray, Alexander D Edwards

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Automation in the Life Science Research Laboratory.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah H NeedsReading School of Pharmacy, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3407-9637
Tai The DiepReading School of Pharmacy, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, United Kingdom.
Stephanie P BullReading School of Pharmacy, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, United Kingdom.
Anton Lindley-DecaireCentre for Electronic Imaging, The Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom.
Partha RayDepartment of Animal Sciences, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8375-8279
Alexander D EdwardsReading School of Pharmacy, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growth in open-source hardware designs combined with the low-cost of high performance optoelectronic and robotics components has supported a resurgence of in-house custom lab equipment development. We describe a low cost (below $700), open-source, fully customizable high-throughput imaging system for analytical microbiology applications. The system comprises a Raspberry Pi camera mounted on an aluminium extrusion frame with 3D-printed joints controlled by an Arduino microcontroller running open-source Repetier Host Firmware. The camera position is controlled by simple G-code scripts supplied from a Raspberry Pi singleboard computer and allow customized time-lapse imaging of microdevices over a large imaging area. Open-source OctoPrint software allows remote access and control. This simple yet effective design allows high-throughput microbiology testing in multiple formats including formats for bacterial motility, colony growth, microtitre plates and microfluidic devices termed 'lab-on-a-comb' to screen the effects of different culture media components and antibiotics on bacterial growth. The open-source robot design allows customization of the size of the imaging area; the current design has an imaging area of ~420 × 300mm, which allows 29 'lab-on-a-comb' devices to be imaged which is equivalent 3480 individual 1μl samples. The system can also be modified for fluorescence detection using LED and emission filters embedded on the PiCam for more sensitive detection of bacterial growth using fluorescent dyes.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Screening AssaysMicrobiological TechniquesPrinting, Three-DimensionalRoboticsTime-Lapse ImagingAnimalsAutomationBacteriaCattleDrug Resistance, MicrobialFemaleFluorescenceMastitis, Bovine

Identifiers

PMID31743346
PMCPMC6863568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.