ArticleJournal of vitreoretinal diseases2019
Visual and Anatomic Outcomes in Perforating Ocular Injuries.
Article in Journal of vitreoretinal diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Analysis of Perforating Globe Injuries with Intraorbital Foreign Bodies: An 18-Year Retrospective Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- The clinical features and the factors affecting visual prognosis in pediatric open-globe ınjuries.International ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Autologous tenon capsule packing to treat posterior exit wound of penetrating injury: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Article
- Long-Term Outcome of Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Retained Posterior Segment Intraocular Foreign Body Secondary to Gunshot Injury.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Article
- Predictors of traumatic eye injuries at high-risk for ophthalmic complications in children.European journal of pediatrics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis article reports the presentation, management, and outcomes in patients suffering perforating ocular injuries.
methodsA retrospective review was conducted at a single ophthalmology Level 1 trauma center. Patients with evidence of traumatic ocular perforation, with surgical intervention attended by a single vitreoretinal surgeon (W.F.M.), were reviewed between 2009 and 2017.
resultsSix eyes from 6 patients with perforating ocular injuries were studied. All patients were male, between ages 11 and 56 years. Perforation was the result of gunshots (3), other accidental injury (2), or surgical complication (1). Varying degrees of retinal detachments were seen in all 6 patients. Pars plana vitrectomy, with endolaser around posterior entry or exit wounds, was performed on average 21.7 ± 8.9 days from the time of injury (range, 0-58 days). In all cases with intraorbital foreign bodies, the foreign bodies were left in place. The most recent postoperative visual acuity ranged from 20/25 to counting fingers. Missile injuries tended to have poorer vision. All cases achieved full anatomic attachment at most recent follow-up. There have been no orbital complications related to retained intraorbital foreign bodies, including endophthalmitis, orbital infections, or mechanical strabismus.
conclusionThis study demonstrates successful anatomic outcomes of 6 cases of perforating ocular injuries. Visual outcomes were variable, though missile injuries demonstrated worse prognosis, whereas several nonmissile macula-involving cases achieved quite favorable results. Although traumatic perforating injuries generally have guarded visual prognoses, favorable results may be achieved in select scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.