Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31741917›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2019

A Review and Outcome of Adenoidectomy Performed in Resource Limited Settings.

Olajide Toye Gabriel, Olajuyin Oyebanji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Adenoidectomy: Anatomical Versus Clinical Success.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Olajide Toye GabrielDepartment of Ear, Nose and Throat Surgery, Federal Medical Centre, Ido Ekiti, Ekiti State Nigeria.
Olajuyin Oyebanji2Department of Ear, Nose and Throat Surgery, Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital, Ado Ekiti, Ekiti State Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adenoidectomy remains invaluable in alleviating the obstructive symptoms of adenoid enlargement in children. The aim of this study is to review the conventional method of adenoidectomy with a view to establish its role and success in resource limited setting. A 5-year retrospective review of pediatric patients that had adenoidectomy operations done at two tertiary healthcare facilities was conducted. The clinic, ward, theatre registers and the patients' case files were the sources of information. Patients that had adenoidectomy with other otolaryngological procedures were excluded from the study. Data generated were descriptively analyzed using SPSS version 14.0. A total of 71 patients had adenoidectomy done. Of this, 65 cases were reviewed. There were a total of 45 males and 20 females with age range 11 months-10 years. The main indication for surgery was obstructive nasal symptoms. Conventional adenoidectomy was performed with standard adenoid curette. Intra-operative blood loss was less than 60 ml and none of the patients had blood transfusion. The average duration of admission post-operatively was 1.1 day. Fifty-eight (89 %) of the patients were relieved of their obstructive symptoms postoperatively. Conventional curettage adenoidectomy still have a role to play especially in resource limited setting where newer techniques may be nothing but a luxury. Adequate preoperative work-up, good anesthetic and surgical techniques are sine-qua-none to successful surgical outcome. There is also a need for early referral to otolaryngologists as this will not only ensure optimal intervention but also minimal postoperative complications.

Indexed as

AdenoidectomyConventionalOutcomeResource limited setting

Identifiers

PMID31741917
PMCPMC6848313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.