Primary implantation of non-valved glaucoma-drainage-device in sulcus in iridocorneal endothelial syndrome.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Primary implantation of glaucoma drainage device in secondary glaucoma: Comparison of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant versus Ahmed glaucoma valve.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2025
   Article
2. Retrocorneal membrane interception enhanced penetrating canaloplasty for patients with open angle glaucoma secondary to ICE syndrome.International ophthalmology · 2024
   Article
3. Ex-PRESS shunt combined with ab-interno peripheral iridectomy: A new surgical procedure for iridocorneal endothelial syndrome.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2023
   Article
4. Commentary: Placement of the tube of a glaucoma drainage device: Different horses for different courses.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.