Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31741834›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2019

The Diagnostic Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Identifying Unsuspected Malignancy in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation for Vertebral Compression Fractures.

Chew Zhihong, Cheng Sheng DA Jowell, Syed Aftab, Seang Beng Tan, Chang Ming Guo, John Chen Li Tat, Poh Ling Fong, William Yeo, Mashfiqul A Siddiqui

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chew ZhihongDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Cheng Sheng DA JowellDuke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Syed AftabDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Seang Beng TanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Chang Ming GuoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
John Chen Li TatDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Poh Ling FongDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
William YeoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Mashfiqul A SiddiquiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Singapore General Hospital · SGDuke-NUS Medical School · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to identify the rate of unsuspected malignancy in vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) treated with percutaneous vertebral augmentation procedures (PVAPs).

methodsFrom 2004-2015, 410 patients with VCFs underwent PVAPs with biopsy in a single tertiary hospital. All patients had preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) read by consultant radiologists and reviewed by the performing surgeon prior to PVAPs. All procedures were performed by fellowship-trained spine surgeons. A patient was considered to have an unsuspected malignancy if preoperative MRI was negative for malignancy but histology from the operative biopsy was positive.

resultsA total of 44 of 45 patients (97.8%) were identified to have malignancy on preoperative MRI. One patient had a negative MRI but positive biopsy (myeloma). This patient also had a positive myeloma panel. A total of 41 of 44 patients with suspicious MRI preoperatively had a history of malignancy with histology consistent with metastatic spread from the known primary. Two patients had a new diagnosis of malignancy (1 breast carcinoma, 1 metastatic cancer likely of breast or gastrointestinal origin). Younger patients were more likely to have a VCF due to malignancy (odds ratio, 28.33 in age < 60 years).

conclusionsAlmost 98% of patients with malignancy (44 of 45 patients) could be successfully identified with a preoperative MRI. The addition of a myeloma panel to MRI identified all patients with malignancies prior to PVAP in our study. We recommend MRI and myeloma panel for all patients with VCFs to be treated with PVAPs. For patients who undergo a PVAP, routine biopsy should be performed.

Identifiers

PMID31741834
PMCPMC6833966
OpenAlexW2987668930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.